Институт За Политичке Студије

Добрињска 11
11000 Београд

Контакт подаци

FROM TERRORIST EVENT TO POLITICAL EFFECT: AN ANALYTICAL MODEL OF THE POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF TERRORISM

Сажетак

The paper analyzes the relationship between a terrorist event and its political effect. It starts from the assumption that the immediate characteristics of a terrorist attack, such as the number of victims, target selection, mode of execution, and symbolic value of the attacked object, do not provide a sufficient explanation of its political consequences. The main aim of the paper is to formulate an analytical model that explains the political effect of a terrorist event as an outcome of the interaction between institutional, political, and social determinants. In this model, the terrorist event is treated as the initial analytical unit, while the political effect is treated as the dependent outcome to be explained. The model is empirically examined through a comparative analysis of three cases: the terrorist attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001, the Madrid attacks of March 11, 2004, and the Norway attacks of July 22, 2011. The analysis shows that the different political outcomes of these events can be explained more consistently by examining institutional responses, political definitions of the threat, and social interpretations of the attack than by relying solely on the immediate characteristics of the terrorist events themselves.

Референце

  • Abrahms, Max. 2006. “Why Terrorism Does Not Work.” International Security 31 (2): 42–78. DOI: 10.1162/isec.2006.31.2.42
  • Amarasinghe, Ashani. 2023. “Public sentiment in times of terror.” Journal of Development Economics 162: 103058. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103058
  • Ari, Emine, Reşat Bayer, Özge Kemahlıoğlu, and Ece Kural [Ari et al.]. 2024. “Avoiding fallout from terrorist attacks: The role of local politics and governments.” Journal of Peace Research 61 (2): 263–278. DOI: 10.1177/00223433221126715
  • Bali, Valentina A. 2007. “Terror and Elections: Lessons from Spain.” Electoral Studies 26 (3): 669–687. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.04.004.
  • Berrebi, Claude, and Esteban F. Klor. 2008. “Are Voters Sensitive to Terrorism? Direct Evidence from the Israeli Electorate.” American Political Science Review 102 (3): 279–301. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055408080246.
  • Boin, Arjen, Paul ’t Hart, and Allan McConnell. 2009. “Crisis Exploitation: Political and Policy Impacts of Framing Contests.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (1): 81–106. DOI: 10.1080/13501760802453221.
  • Christensen, Tom, Per Lægreid, and Lise H. Rykkja. 2015. “The Challenges of Coordination in National Security Management: The Case of the Terrorist Attack in Norway.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 81 (2): 352–372. DOI: 10.1177/0020852314564307
  • Crenshaw, Martha. 1981. “The Causes of Terrorism.” Comparative Politics 13 (4): 379–399. DOI: 10.2307/421717
  • Đorić, Marija, and Strahinja Obrenović. 2024. “Foreign terrorist fighters as a potential security problem of the Republic of Serbia.” Srpska politička misao 87 (5): 9–26. DOI: 10.5937/spm87-52520
  • Epifanio, Mariaelisa, Marco Giani, and Ria Ivandic. 2023. “Wait and See? Public Opinion Dynamics after Terrorist Attacks.” The Journal of Politics 85 (3): 843–859. DOI: 10.1086/723978
  • Freilich, Joshua D., Steven M. Chermak, Rachael A. Arietti, and Noah D. Turner [Freilich et al.]. 2024. “Terrorism, Political Extremism, and Crime and Criminal Justice.” Annual Review of Criminology 7 (1): 187–209. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-022422-121713.
  • Germann, Micha, Amélie Godefroidt, and Fernando Mendez. 2026. “Does Islamist Terrorism Still Affect Political Attitudes?” European Journal of Political Research 1–21. DOI: 10.1017/S1475676526101017
  • Glazzard, Andrew, and Alastair Reed. 2021. After the Attack: Lessons for Governments and Journalists in Reporting Terrorist Incidents. ICCT Report. The Hague: International Centre for CounterTerrorism. DOI: 10.19165/2021.3.04.
  • Godefroidt, Amélie. 2023. “How Terrorism Does (and Does Not) Affect Citizens’ Political Attitudes: A Meta‐Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 67 (1): 22–38. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12692
  • Hoffman, Bruce. 2006. Inside Terrorism, 2nd revised and expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Homeland Security Act. 2002. Public Law 107–296, 107th Congress.
  • Institute for Economics & Peace. 2022. Global Terrorism Index 2022: Measuring the Impact of Terrorism. Sydney: Institute for Economics & Peace.
  • Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw, Elena Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, and Gerdien de Vries. 2025. “Public perception of terrorism attacks: A conjoint experiment.” Journal of Peace Research 62 (2): 310–327. DOI: 10.1177/00223433231200922
  • Kearns, Erin M., Allison E. Betus, and Anthony F. Lemieux. 2019. “Why Do Some Terrorist Attacks Receive More Media Attention Than Others?” Justice Quarterly 36 (6): 985–1022. DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2018.1524507.
  • Kydd, Andrew H., and Barbara F. Walter. 2006. “The Strategies of Terrorism.” International Security 31 (1): 49–80. DOI: 10.1162/isec.2006.31.1.49.
  • Montalvo, Jose G. 2011. “Voting after the Bombings: A Natural Experiment on the Effect of Terrorist Attacks on Democratic Elections.” Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (4): 1146–1154. DOI: 10.1162/REST_a_00115.
  • Mueller, John. 2005. “Six Rather Unusual Propositions about Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 17 (4): 487–505. DOI: 10.1080/095465591009359.
  • Nagel, Christof, Amy Nivette, and Christian Czymara. 2024. “Do jihadist terrorist attacks cause changes in institutional trust? A multi‐site natural experiment.” European Journal of Political Research 63 (2): 411–432. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12612
  • National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. 2004. The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism [START]. 2022. Global Terrorism Database 1970 - 2020 [data file]. University of Maryland.
  • NOU. 2012. Rapport fra 22. juli-kommisjonen: Norges offentlige utredninger 2012:14. Preliminary English Version of Selected Chapters. Oslo: Departementenes servicesenter, Informasjonsforvaltning.
  • Oswald, Michael T., Kristina Furst, and Michael Johann. 2023. “Mass Media’s Role in Terrorism: The Issue of Frame Sending and Terrorist Communication.” Political Science Quarterly 138 (4): 529–547. DOI: 10.1093/psquar/qqad094
  • Pape, Robert A. 2005. Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Random House.
  • Pavlićević, Predrag. 2025. “Globalization, crisis and discourse on terrorism.” Srpska politička misao 91 (3): 55–76. DOI: 10.5937/spm91-56227
  • Peri, Giovanni, Daniel I. Rees, and Brock Smith. 2023. “Terrorism and political attitudes: Evidence from European social surveys.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 99: 103864. DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2022.103864
  • Petrović, Zoran, and Violeta Rašković Talović. 2024. „Političkobezbednosne refleksije albanskog terorizma na Republiku Srbiju.” Srpska politička misao 88 (6): 79–99. DOI: 10.5937/spm88-54494
  • Rapoport, David C. 2004. “The Four Waves of Modern Terrorism.” In Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy, ed. Audrey Kurth Cronin and James M. Ludes, 46–73. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Rees, Daniel I., and Brock Smith. 2022. “Terror attacks and election outcomes in Europe, 1970–2017.” Economics Letters 219: 110770. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110770
  • Rose, William, Rysia Murphy, and Max Abrahms. 2007. “Does Terrorism Ever Work? The 2004 Madrid Train Bombings.” International Security 32 (1): 185–192.
  • Schmid, Alex P. 2011. “The Definition of Terrorism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research, ed. Alex P. Schmid, 39–98. London and New York: Routledge.
  • The White House. 2002. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: The White House.
  • Volker, Teresa. 2024. “How terrorist attacks distort public debates: A comparative study of right-wing and Islamist extremism.” Journal of European Public Policy 31 (11): 3487–3514. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2269194