Институт За Политичке Студије

Добрињска 11
11000 Београд

Контакт подаци

PROTECTION OF FAMILY IDENTITY IN THE CONTEXT OF CONTEMPORARY SECURITY CHALLENGES

Сажетак

The protection of family identity is a complex legal issue that encompasses a set of values, relationships and characteristics through which the continuity of family life, the personal and collective identity of its members, as well as their legal and social security are achieved. In the context of contemporary security challenges, which are characterized by increased institutional intervention, technological development and the transformation of the concept of security, the protection of family identity gains special importance. The paper starts from the standpoint that security is not exclusively an instrument of state control, but also a legal value whose essence is to ensure the conditions for the preservation of the basic elements of personal and family identity. Special attention is paid to contemporary security challenges, including terrorism, as a phenomenon that, through identity narratives and institutional responses, directly affects societal and internal security, as well as the protection of family identity. The aim of the paper is to point out the importance of legal certainty as a prerequisite for the protection of family identity and to contribute to the theoretical and normative debate on the relationship between security and family rights in the contemporary legal order. The analysis demonstrates that disproportionate security measures and excessive securitization may lead to the weakening of family cohesion and the erosion of identity structures, while legal certainty, respect for human rights, and the consistent application of the principle of proportionality represent key prerequisites for preserving family identity in the contemporary security environment.

Референце

  • Ahdash, Fatima. 2018. “The interaction between family law and counter-terrorism: a critical examination of the radicalisation cases in the family courts.” Child and Family Law Quarterly 30: 389–414.
  • Bjelajac, Željko, i Aleksandar Filipović. 2020. ,,Uticaj kulture ‛probuđenosti’ na bezbednost Centralne i Istočne Evrope.” Politika nacionalne bezbednosti 19 (2): 175–193. DOI: 10.22182/pnb.1922020.8.
  • Brady, Erika. 2024. “Future security threats arising from the UK’s deprivation of citizenship: a model to understand the human rights-securityrisk landscape.” Critical studies on terrorism 17 (3): 757–785. DOI: 10.1080/17539153.2024.2373857.
  • Bursać, Boris. 2023. Politikološka analiza terorističkih organizacija u Rusiji u XIX veku. Leposavić: Institut za srpsku kulturu Priština – Leposavić.
  • Buzan, Barry, Ole Weaver, and Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Čičkarić, Lilijana. 2005. „Teorijsko-hipotetički okvir za istraživanje političke socijalizacije u porodici.” Sociološki pregled 39 (3): 291–307. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg0503291C.
  • Čović, Ana. 2020. „Pravo na privatnost i zaštita ličnih podataka u doba pandemija COVID-19.” Sociološki pregled 54 (3): 670–697. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg54-27284.
  • Ćorić, Dragana. 2011. „Novi minuti posvećeni Radbruhovoj formuli.” Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu 45 (3): 635–645. DOI: 10.5937/zrpfns45-0102C.
  • Đorić, Marija. 2021. Ekstremizam i nova realnost: svet u doba koronavirusa. Beograd: Institut za političke studije.
  • European Database of Asylum Law [EDAL]. 2016. “Slovenia – Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, 16 June 2016, Judgment U-I-68/16, Up-213/15.” European Database of Asylum Law. Last accessed January 20, 2026.
    https://www.asylumlawdatabase.eu/en/case-law/slovenia-constitutional-court-republic-slovenia-16-june-2016-judgment-u-i-6816-21315.
  • European Court of Human Rights [ECHR]. 1950. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Europen Court of Human Rights. Last accessed January 2, 2026.
    https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENG.
  • Evropski sud za ljudska prava [ESLJP]. 2015. Pregled prakse Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u 2015. godini. Evropski sud za ljudska prava. Poslednji pristup 20. januar 2026.
    https://ks.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr-ks/overview-2015-bos.
  • Hoffman, Bruce. 2017. Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Joksić, Ivan, i Vesna Rajaković. 2020. “Family as a factor of socialization and resocialization.” Pravo – teorija i praksa 37 (4): 42–54. DOI: 10.5937/ptp2004042J.
  • Jugović, Aleksandar, i Dragan Živaljević. 2021. „Pojmovni i konceptualni pristupi radikalizaciji kao procesu razvoja nasilnog ekstremizma.” Sociološki pregled 55 (2): 436–457. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg55-31516.
  • Kaufmann, Mareile, Simon Egbert, and Matthias Leese. 2019. “Predictive policing and the politics of patterns.” The British Journal of Criminology 59 (3): 674–692. DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azy060.
  • Кеkić, Dalibor. 2004. „Kultura bezbednosti u savremenim shvatanjima bezbednosti.” Međunarodni problemi 56 (2–3): 1–21. DOI: 10.2298/MEDJP0403221K.
  • Kostić, Mladen. 2016. „Koncept bezbednosti.” Vojno delo 68 (7): 68–84. DOI: 10.5937/vojdelo1607068K.
  • Košarac, Biserka. 2023. „Stavovi mladih u Republici Srpskoj o braku, porodici i roditeljstvu.” Napredak 4 (1): 83–92. DOI: 10.5937/napredak4-42889.
  • Lipovac, Milan, Slađana Đurić, i Ana Paraušić. 2022. „Akademska tematizacija sekuritizacije u urbanom prostoru.” U Urbana bezbednost i urbani razvoj, ur. Svetlana Stanarević i Aleksandra Đukić, 105–113. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu Fakultet bezbednosti.
  • Lyon, David. 2018. The Culture of Surveillance: Watching as a Way of Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Mihaila, Carmen Oana, and Mircea Mihaila. 2023. “Video surveillance and artificial Intelligence: how does it affect privacy and intellectual property rights?” Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 62 (100): 189–222. DOI: 10.5937/zrpfn0-48197.
  • Moghaddam, Fathali. 2005. “The Staircase to Terrorism: A Psychological Exploration.” American Psychologist 60 (2): 161–169. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.161.
  • Slavković, Ana, i Vukan Slavković. 2023. „Vaspitanje adolescenata u vreme rijaliti program ai tabloidnog novinarstva – zakonska regulative.” Sinteze (23): 29–39. DOI: 10.5937/sinteze12-40589.
  • Sretović, Dragutin, Miroslav Talijan, i Hatidža Beriša. 2016. „Savremeni concept bezbednosti.” Vojno delo 68 (1): 73–101. DOI: 10.5937/vojdelo1601073S.
  • Stajić, Ljubomir, Nenad Radivojević, i Vladan Mirković. 2017. „Neki aspekti politike unutrašnje bezbednosti kao elementa strategije nacionalne bezbednosti Republike Srbije.” Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu (4): 1325–1342. DOI: 10.5937/zrpfns51-16569.
  • Stevanović, Miroslav, i Dragan Đurđević. 2020. „Uloga i značaj računarske forenzike u suzbijanju terorizma.” Megatrend revija 17 (1): 129–142. DOI: 10.5937/MegRev2001129S.
  • Subotić, Milovan. 2025. „Konfrontirajući identiteti na Balkanu kao bezbednosni izazov.” Politika nacionalne bezbednosti 30 (3): 23–48. DOI: 10.5937/pnb30-58582.
  • Tomanović, Smiljka, i Dragan Stanojević. 2024. Sociologija porodičnog života. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet.
  • Trajković, Marko. 2004. „O normativnosti prava Hansa Kelzena.” Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 45: 221–240.
  • Ustavni sud Bosne i Hercegovine. n.d. ,,Miješanje u privatni i porodični život.” Ustavni sud Bosne i Hercegovine. Last accessed January 21, 2026.
    https://www.ustavnisud.ba/sr/mijesanje-u-obiteljski-zivot.
  • Zedner, Lucia. 2009. Security. London: Routledge.