Изабери језик:
Тема броја




This paper is based on qualitative secondary data analysis to provide more comprehensive insights into innovative electoral policy choices of election management bodies (EMBs), faced with multiple challenges of COVID-19 to different aspects of organisation of electoral cycle: its regulatory, operational, and procedural framework to ensure safe voting environment, voter participation and democratic legitimacy. Various COVID-19 related arrangements are reviewed: health safety measures and more extensive use of already existing special voting arrangements (SVAs) – early, postal, mobile or proxy voting and possibilities for online voting in the future. Strengths and weaknesses, costs and benefits of these hybrid voting methods are compared. Conclusion of this analysis is that the traditional preference of EMBs for in-person, in-polling station voting with low-tech paper ballots remains unchanged by COVID-19. There was not enough time, resources and political incentive of decision-makers to introduce innovative or high-tech online SVAs. Analysis shows that postponement of elections during pandemic challenges institutional stability and should not be regarded as an example of future good practice. Decreased or inadequately high voter turnout during COVID-19 was registered as a significant threat to democratic legitimacy and to resilience of democracy. Necessity for strategic contingency planning of electoral cycle is confirmed and recommended.

кључне речи:


    • Asplund E., Heuver L., Ahmed F., Stevense B., Umar S., James T. and Clark A. 2021. Elections and Covid-19: How special voting expanded in 2020. Last accessed 20. 02. 2022. https://www.idea.int/news-media/news/elections-and-covid-19-how-special-voting-arrangements-were-expanded-2020
    • Asplund, E., James, T. and Clark, A. 2020. Electoral officials need more money to run elections during COVID-19. Last accessed 24. 11. 2021. https://www.democraticaudit.com/2020/07/14/electoral-officials-need-more-money-to-run-elections-during-COVID-19/
    • Birch S., Buril F., Cheeseman N., Clark A., Darnolf S., Dodsworth S., Garber L., Gutiér-
      rez-Romero R., Hollstein T., James T. S., Mohan V. and Sawyer K. 2020. How to hold
      elections safely and democratically during the COVID-19 pandemic
      . London: The British
    • Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • Buril F. and Darnolf S. 2020. Low Voter Turnouts, Fear, Disinformation and Disrupted Supply Chains: How Election Commissions Are Unprepared for COVID-19. Last accessed 15. 10. 2021. https://www.ifes.org/news/low-voter-turnouts-fear-disinformation-and-disrupted-supply-chains
    • Club de Madrid and International IDEA (n.d.) Mechanisms of Democracy & Fundamental Rights. Last accessed 27. 01. 2022. https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/news/news-pdfs/WG-1-IDEApaper-Mechanisms-democracy-fundamental-rights.pdf
    • Čepo D., Petrović V. and Karlović A. 2020. Elections During the Pandemic: Lessons Learned from the 2020 Early General Elections in Croatia. Contemporary Southeastern Europe, 7(2), 97-108.
    • Darnolf S., Buril F. and Applegate M. 2020. Indelible Ink in Elections: Mitigating Risks of COVID-19 Transmission While Maintaining Effectiveness. Last accessed 25. 03. 2022. https://www.electionguide.org/digest/post/17599/
    • European Commission. 2018. Study on the Benefits and Drawbacks of Remote Voting. Last accessed 15. 12. 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/eu-citizenship/electoral-rights/studies/study-benefits-and-drawbacks-remote-voting_en
    • Heinmaa, E. A. 2020. Special Voting Arrangements (SVAs) in Europe: In-Country Postal, Early, Mobile and Proxy Arrangements in Individual Countries. Last accessed 17. 01. 2022. https://www.idea.int/news-media/news/special-voting-arrangements-svas-europe-country-postal-early-mobile-and-proxy
    • IFES. 2020. Elections in Ukraine: 2020 local elections. Last accessed 15. 03. 2022. https://www.ifes.org/faqs/elections-ukraine-2020-local-elections
    • International IDEA. 2020. Managing Elections During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Considerations for Decision-Makers, Policy Brief. Last accessed 01. 10. 2021. https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/managing-elections-during-covid-19-pandemic-considerations-decision-makers
    • International IDEA. 2022. Global overview of COVID-19: Impact on elections. Last accessed 15. 01. 2022. https://www.idea.int/news-media/multimedia-reports/global-overview-covid-19-impact-elections
    • Landman T. and Splendore L. D. G. 2020. Pandemic democracy: elections and COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, 23 (7-8), 1060-1066.
    • Murphy, J. 2020. Parliaments and Crisis: Challenges and Innovations. Parliamentary Primer, No. 1
    • Orr G. 2015. Ritual and Rhythm in Electoral Systems: A Comparative Legal Account. Ashgate: Routledge.
    • Park S., Specter M., Narula N. and Rivest R. L. 2021. Going from bad to worse: from Internet voting to blockchain voting. Journal of Cybersecurity, 7 (1), tyaa025, https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyaa025
    • Spinelli, A. 2020. Managing Elections under the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Republic of Korea’s Crucial Test. International IDEA Technical Paper, no. 2, 1-8. Last accessed 05. 01. 2022. https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/managing-elections-under-covid-19-pandemic-republic-korea-crucial-test
    • The ACE Electoral Knowledge Network Project. 2022. Last accessed 12. 03. 2022. https://aceproject.org/electoral-advice/electoral-assistance/electoral-cycle
    • The Venice Commission. 2002. Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters (Code of Good Practice), Guidelines and Explanatory Report.
    • Toby S. J. 2020. Comparative Electoral Management – Performance, Networks and Instruments. Abingdon: Routledge
    • Toby S. J. and Alihodzic S. 2020. When Is It Democratic to Postpone an Election? Elections During Natural Disasters, COVID-19, and Emergency Situations. Election Law Journal, 19(3). Last accessed 05. 03. 2022. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/elj.2020.0642
    • Vukomanovic, D. 2020. New modes of acculturation and democratic institutional change during COVID-19 crisis. In: Bondarevskaya I., Todosijević B. (eds.) Political and economic self-constitution: Media, political culture and democracy. Proceedings of the 8th international scientific and practical seminar. Belgrade: Institute of Social Sciences, Kyiv: Center for Personal and Social Transformations. pp. 24-28.
периодика Српска политичка мисао 4/2022 4/2022 UDC: 616.98:578.834]:324(100) 25-41