POLITIKA KONKURENCIJE EVROPSKE UNIJE I USLUGE OD OPŠTEG EKONOMSKOG INTERESA

Siniša Domazet

Sažetak

Autor ovog članka se rukovodi sa dva različita me­toda. Prvi od njih je pozitivno-pravni metod koji je namenjen analizi pozitivnih pravila u pravu konkurencije EU u oblasti usluga od opšteg ekonomskog interesa (SGEIs). Drugi od njih je pravno-logički metod indukcije i dedukcije, koji je primenjen u rešavanju mnogih pravnih i logičkih problema u vezi sa uslugama od opšteg ekonomskog interesa. Mnoga pitanja se javljaju kada govorimo o SGEIs: kako se definišu usluge od opšteg ekonomskog interesa, kada će se aktivnost okvalifikovati kao ekonomska za potrebe konkurentskih pravila, kada je aktivnost neekonomska, mogu li pravila Ugovora o državnoj pomoći da se primene na operatore usluga neprofitnog karaktera i tako dalje. Odluka u slučaju Altmark ustanovljava neke vodeće principe, ali mi smatramo da je poželjan dalji razvoj u pogledu definicije usluga od opšteg ekonomskog interesa.

Reference

1. Andreas Bartosch, Clarification or Confusion? How to Reconcile the ECJ’s rullings in Altmark and Chronopost?, Working Paper 2, Clasf Wor­king Paper Series, 2003.
2. Ivan Draganic, „State Aid or Compensation for Extra Costs: Tuning the Test of Proportionality in EC Competition Law“, European State Aid Law Quarterly, 683, 2006.
3. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, Frequ­ently asked questions in relation with Commission Decision of 28 No­vember 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic inte­rest, and of the Community Framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation (Accompanying document to the Communication on „Services of general interest, including social services of general inte­rest: a new European commitment, COM (2007) 1516 final
4. Alison Jones, Brenda Sufrin, EC Competition Law, Oxford University Press, 2008.
5. Paul Klemperer, „What Really Matters in Auction Design“, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16, No 1/2002
6. Orla Lynskey, „The Application of Article 86(2) EC to Measures that do not fulfil the Altmark Criteria: Institutionalising Incoherence in the Legal Framework Governing State Compensation of Public Service Obligati­ons“, World Competition, 31/2007
7. Phedon Nicolaides, Mihalis Kekelekis, Maria Kleis, State Aid Policy in the European Community, Wolters Kluwer, 2008.
8. Erika Szyszczak, The Regulation of the State in Competitive Markets in the EU, Hart Publishing, 2007.
9. Erika Szyszczak, „Financing Services of Ge Lars Peter Svane, „Public service compensation in practice: Commission package on State aid for Services of General Economic Interest“, Competition Policy Newsletter, 3, 2005.
10. Sandro Santamato, Nicola Pesaresi, Compensation for services of gene­ral economic interest: some thoughts on the Altmark ruling, Competition Policy Newsletter, 1, 2004.
11. Wolf Sauter, Harm Schepel, State and Market in European Union Law, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
12. Services of General Economic Interest, Opinion Prepared by the State Aid Group of EAGCP, 2006.
13. Commission Decision of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of public service com­pensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest, OJ 2005/L 312/67
14. Community Framework for State aid in the form of public service com­pensation (Accompanying document to the Communication on „Services of general interest, including social services of general interest: a new European commitment, COM (2007) 1516 final.