POJAM POMIRENJA: DEFINICIJA, ELEMENTI I PROBLEMI

Dr Dejan Bursać

Sažetak

U teoriji mirovnih studija možemo pronaći više definicija pomirenja, koje su u velikoj meri komplementarne, te stoga ovaj pojam nije teško definisati. Teškoće se javljaju naknadno, pri pokušajima operacionalizacije pomirenja kao koncepta, posebno kod određivanja njegovog sadržaja, elemenata i ishoda u različitim okolnostima. Ovaj rad nastoji da predstavi teorije o pomirenju, ali i da ispita šta se pod tim određenjem podrazumeva u definicijama različitih autora. Objasnićemo osnovne pojmove i elemente koji čine proces pomirenja, navešćemo najčešće teorijske pristupe, ali i istražiti neke sporne aspekte – naročito kada se radi o distinkciji između pomirenja nakon unutrašnjih i međunarodnih sukoba. Rad posebno obraća pažnju na delo Luisa Krajsberga (eng. Louis Kriesberg), jednog od najznačajnijih teoretičara pomirenja, ali ne zanemaruje ni druge važne autore.

Reference

1. Auerbach, Yehudith, „The Role of Forgiveness in Reconciliation“, in Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov (ed.), From conflict resolution to Reconciliation, Oxford University Press, New York, 2004.
2. Bar-On, Dan, „Reconciliation Revisited for More Conceptual and Empirical Clarity“, in Bec-Neumann, Janja (ed.), Darkness at Noon: War Crimes, Genocide and Memories, University of Sarajevo.
3. Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaаcov, „Dialectics between Stable Peace and Reconciliation“,in Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov (ed.), From conflict resolution to Reconciliation, Oxford University Press, New York, 2004.
4. Bar-Tal, Daniel, „Reconciliation as a Foundation of Culture of Peace“, in de Rivera, Joseph (ed.), Handbook on Building Cultures of Peace, Springer, New York, 2009.
5. Bar-Tal, Daniel; Bennink, Gemma H.; „The Nature of Reconciliation as an Outcome and as a Process“, in Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov (ed.), From conflict resolution to Reconciliation, Oxford University Press, New York, 2004.
6. Burgess, Heidi; Burgess, Guy M.; Encyclopedia of Conflict Resolution, ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, 1997.
7. Correlates of War, http://www.correlatesofwar.org/
8. Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala Universitet http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/datasets/
9. Галтунг, Јохан, Мирним средствима до мира, Службени гласник и Југоисток XXI, Београд, 2009.
10. Hermann, Tamar, „Reconciliation: Reflections on the Theoretical and Practical Utility of the Term“, in Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov (ed.), From conflict resolution to Reconciliation, Oxford University Press, New York, 2004.
11. Kelman, Herbert C., Group Processes in the Resolution of International Conflicts, American Psychologist, 52, 1997.
12. Kelman, Herbert C., „Reconciliation as Identity Change: A Social – Psychological Perspective“, in Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov (ed.), From conflict resolution to Reconciliation, Oxford University Press, New York, 2004.
13. Kriesberg, Louis, „Comparing Reconciliation Actions within and between Countries“,in Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov (ed.), From conflict resolution to Reconciliation, Oxford University Press, New York, 2004.
14. Maoz, Ifat, „Social-Cognitive Mechanisms in Reconciliation“, in Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov (ed.), From conflict resolution to Reconciliation, Oxford University Press, New York, 2004.
15. Miall, Hugh; Ramsbotham, Olivier; Woodhouse, Tom; Contemporary Conflict Resolution, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1999.
16. Montville, Joseph V., „Reconciliation as Realpolitik: Facing the Burdens of History in Political Conflict Resolution“ in Rothbart, Daniel; Valentinovna Korostelina, Karina (eds.), Identity, morality and threat: Studies in violent conflict, Lexington Books, 2006.
17. Накарада, Радмила, „Путеви помирења“, у Годишњак Факултета политичких наука, Београд, 2011.
18. Santa-Barbara, Joanna, „Reconciliation“, in Webel, Charles; Galtung, Johan (eds.), Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies, Routledge, New York, 2007.
19. Schaap, Andrew, Political Reconciliation, Routledge, New York, 2005.