ПОБУНЕ НА ГЛОБАЛНОЈ ПЕРИФЕРИЈИ КАО ТЕМПОРАЛНА СУСПЕНЗИЈА НЕОЛИБЕРАЛНОГ ПОРЕТКА

Др Срђан Кораћ

Сажетак

Рад анализира феномен побуна на глобалној периферији као насилне догађаје који нарушавају просторну логику и епистемичку извесност планетарног демократског мира и доводе до темпоралне суспензије неолибералног поретка. Аутор настоји да докаже претпоставку да је у раном 21. веку императив делотворне контроле над неуправљивим зонама глобалне периферије у суштинској колизији са инструменталношћу рата узетог у виду војног интервенционизма. Теоријско полазиште анализе смештено је у подручју критичке теорије међународних односа и критичких студија рата, а посебно у становишту да рат проистиче из и уједно репродукује динамику односа хијерархије и потчињености на глобалном нивоу, јер је измештен ван цивилизацијских граница Запада и усмерен на регулисање неуправљивих планетарних зона. Анализа се усредсређује на подршку локалног становништва побуњеничким снагама, криминалном предузетништву као извору финансирања побуне, порозне границе између улога цивила и борца, технолошке и тактичке стране побуњеничких акција, те ефикасности тих акција као пет показатеља на којима се проверава теза о својству бесконачности побуна на глобалној периферији као реметилачком чиниоцу делотворности политике њиховог сузбијања. Аутор закључује да несврсисходност сузбијања бесконачних побуна на глобалној периферији драстично умањује употребну вредност рата као средства империјалне спољне политике, тачније инструменталност казнених експедиција у контексту очувања неолибералног континуума производње и светске трговине.

Референце

• 103rd Congress. 1993. “Hearing Before the Select Committee on Intelligence of the United States Senate”, First Session on Nomination of R. James Woolsey to be Director of Central Intelligence. 2–3 February 1993. https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/103296.pdf.
• Arquilla, John & Ryan Nomura. 2015. “Three Wars of Ideas about the Idea of War”. Comparative Strategy 34 (2): 185–201.
• Barfield, Thomas. 2010. Afghanistan: А cultural and political history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Boyle, Mark. 2015. Human Geography: A Concise Introduction. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
• Brighton, Shane. 2019. “Critical war studies”. In Jenny Edkins (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Critical International Relations, 129–142. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
• Cerny, Philip G. 2015. “From warriors to police? The civilianization of security in a globalising world”. International Politics 52: 389–407.
• Collier, Paul & Anke Hoeffler. 2001. Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Washington, DC: World Bank.
• Corbey, Raymond. 2006. “Laying Aside the Spear: Hobbesian Warre and the Maussian Gift”, in: Ton Otto, Henrik Thrane, and Helle Vandkilde (eds), Warefare and Society: Archaeological and Social Anthropological Perspectives. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
• Cox, Robert. 1986. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory”. In Robert Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics, 205–254. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Cox, Rory. 2012. “Asymmetric warfare and military conduct in the Middle Ages”. Journal of Medieval History 38 (1): 100–125.
• Davis, Diane E. 2009. “Non-State Armed Actors, New Imagined Communities, and Shifting Patterns of Sovereignty and Insecurity in the Modern World”. Contemporary Security Policy 30 (2): 221–245.
• Department of the Army. 2009. Tactics in Counterinsurgency. Field Manual 3-24.2 (FM 90-8, FM 7-98). https://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fmi3-24-2.pdf.
• Department of the Army. 2014. Insurgencies and Countering Insurgencies. Field Manual 3-24/MCWP 3-33.5, C1. https://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-24.pdf.
• Dowdall, Jonathan & M. L.R. Smith. 2010. “Counter-insurgency in the Grey: The Ethical Challenge for Military Conduct”. Contemporary Security Policy 31 (1): 34–60.
• Drohan, Colonel Thomas A. 2011. “Bringing ‘Nature of War’ into Irregular Warfare Strategy: Contemporary Applications of Clausewitz’s Trinity”. Defence Studies 11 (3): 497–516.
• Duffield, Mark. 2007. Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples. Cambridge and Malden (MA): Polity Press.
• Fleming, Colin M. 2009. “New or Old Wars? Debating a Clausewitzian Future”. Journal of Strategic Studies 32 (2): 213–241.
• Gill, Stephen. 1995. “Globalisation, Market Civilisation, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism”. Millenium: Journal of International Studies 24 (3): 399–423.
• Grygiel, Jakub. 2013. “The Primacy of Premodern History”. Security Studies 22(1): 1–32.
• Hammond, Grant T. 1990. “Low‐intensity conflict: War by another name”. Small Wars & Insurgencies 1 (3): 226–238.
• Henderson, Errol and J. David Singer. 2002. “ʻNew Warsʼ and Rumors of ʻNew Warsʼ”. International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations 28 (2): 165–190.
• Holsti, Kalevi J. 1999. “The Coming Chaos? Armed Conflict in the Worlds Periphery”. In: T.V. Paul and John A. Hall (eds), International Order and the Future of World Politics, 283–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Jakobsen, Peter Viggo. 2011. “Pushing the Limits of Military Coercion Theory”. International Studies Perspectives 12 (2): 153–170.
• Kaempf, Sebastian. 2011. “Lost through non-translation: Bringing Clausewitzʼs writings on ‘new wars’ back in”. Small Wars & Insurgencies 22 (4): 548–573.
• Kaldor, Mary. 1999. New and Old Wars: Organised Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Kaldor, Mary. 2005. “Old Wars, Cold Wars, New Wars, and the War on Terror”. International Politics 42 (4): 491–498.
• Karp, Aaron. 2009. “The Changing Ownership of War: States, Insurgencies and Technology”. Contemporary Security Policy 30 (2): 375–394.
• Kavanagh, Jennifer et al. 2017. The Past, Present, and Future of U.S. Ground Interventions Identifying Trends, Characteristics, and Signposts. Santa Monica (СА): RAND Corporation.
• Kinross, Stuart. 2004. “Clausewitz and Low-Intensity Conflict”. Journal of Strategic Studies 27 (1): 35–58.
• Kober, Avi. 2002. “Low-intensity Conflicts: Why the Gap Between Theory and Practice?” Defense & Security Analysis 18 (1): 15–38.
• Krause, Keith & Jennifer Milliken. 2009. “Introduction: The Challenge of Non-State Armed Groups”. Contemporary Security Policy 30 (2): 202–220.
• Le Blanc, Joerg. 2013. “The Urban Environment and its Influences on Insurgent Campaigns”. Terrorism and Political Violence 25 (5): 798–819.
• Lutz, Catherine. 2007. “Militarization”, in: David Nugent and Joan Vincent (eds), A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing.
• Mack, Andrew. 1975. “Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict”. World Politics 27: 175–200.
• Malejacq, Romain. 2016. “Warlords, Intervention, and State Consolidation: A Typology of Political Orders in Weak and Failed States”. Security Studies 25 (1): 85–110.
• Marks, Thomas A. 2003. “Urban Insurgency”. Small Wars & Insurgencies 14 (3): 100–157.
• Marshall, Alex. 2016. “From civil war to proxy war: Past history and current dilemmas”. Small Wars & Insurgencies 27 (2): 183–195.
• Mayer, Michael. 2018. Trigger happy: The foundations of US military interventions. Journal of Strategic Studies 42 (2): 259–281.
• Metz, Steven. 1997. “Which Army After Next? The Strategic Implications of Alternative Futures”. Parameters 27 (3): 15–26.
• Monteleone, Carla. 2016. “Do terrorism, organized crime (drug production), and state weakness affect contemporary armed conflicts? An empirical analysis”. Global Change, Peace & Security 28 (1): 35–53.
• Nagl, John A. & Brian M. Burton. 2010. “Thinking Globally and Acting Locally: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Modern Wars – A Reply to Jones and Smith”. The Journal of Strategic Studies 33 (1): 123–138.
• Parmar, Inderjeet. 2018. “The US-led liberal order: imperialism by another name?” International Affairs 94 (1): 151–172.
• Persaud, Randolph B. 1997. “Frantz Fanon, race and world order”. In Stephen Gill and James Mittelman (eds) Innovation and transformation in international studies, 170–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Phelan, Colonel Pat. 2011. “Fourth Generation Warfare and its Challenges for the Military and Society”. Defence Studies 11 (1): 96–119.
• Reed, Donald J. 2008. “Beyond the War on Terror: Into the Fifth Generational of War and Conflict”. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 31 (8): 684–722.
• Reinke de Butrago, Sybille and Resende, Erica. 2019. “The Politics of Otherness: Illustrating the identity/alterity nexus and othering in IR”. In Jenny Edkins (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Critical International Relations, 179–193. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
• Reno, William. 2009. “Explaining Patterns of Violence in Collapsed States”. Contemporary Security Policy 30 (2): 356–374.
• Rodgers, Dennis & Robert Muggah. 2009. “Gangs as Non-State Armed Groups: The Central American Case”. Contemporary Security Policy 30 (2): 301–317.
• Rogers, Paul. 2000. Losing Control: Global Security in the Twenty-first Century. London and Sterling (VA): Pluto Press.
• Ross, Jeremy A. 2017. “Durkheim and the Homo Duplex: Anthropocentrism in Sociology”. Sociological Spectrum 37 (1): 18–26.
• Scheipers, Sibylle. 2014. “Counterinsurgency or irregular warfare? Historiography and the study of ‘small wars’”. Small Wars & Insurgencies 25 (5–6): 879–899.
• Snow, Donald M. 2015. The case against military intervention: Why we do it and why it fails. New York: Routledge.
• Sohn-Rethel, Alfred. 2020. Intellectual and Manual Labour: A Critique of Epistemology. Leiden: Brill.
• Stephens, Alan. 1994. “The transformation of ‘low intensity’ conflict”. Small Wars & Insurgencies 5 (l): 143–161.
• Van Creveld, Martin. 1991. The Transformation of War. New York: The Free Press.
• Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.
• Wolf, Eric. 1999. Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. Norman (OK): University of Oklahoma Press.
• Yun, Minwoo. 2010. “Insurgency warfare as an emerging new mode of warfare and the new enemy”. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 22 (1): 111–125.
• Клаузевиц. Карл фон. 1951. О рату. Београд: Војно дело.