NADNACIONALNA OBAVEŠTAJNA SLUŽBA NA POMOLU?

Srđan T. Korać

Sažetak

Rad analizira evoluciju i delovanje posebnih nadnacionalnih tela i organizacionih jedinica pri postojećim institucijama Evropske unije kojima je povereno obavljanje klasične obaveštajne i kriminalističko-obaveštajne funkcije. Autor analizu stavlja u teorijski okvir omeđen konceptima sekuritizacije javnih politika, demokratske kontrole obaveštajne funkcije i demokratskog legitimiteta, budući da je prenošenje metodologije obaveštajnog rada iz oblasti nacionalne bezbednosti u rad policije, carine, poreskih organa itd. otvorilo novi prostor u kojem može da dođe do narušavanja komunitarnih javnih in­teresa i ugrožavanja ljudskih i građanskih prava delovanjem nadnacionalnih institucija. Autor ukazuje na ozbiljnu pretnju koju pojačana i neselektivna sekuritizacija komu­nitarnih politika ima po krhku ravnotežu između doslednog poštovanja ljudskih prava i bezbednosnih obzira, o čemu svedoče i brojne kontroverze koje su se nedavno pojavile oko demokratske legitimnosti masovne primene obaveštajnih metoda i tehnika spram potencijalnog ugrožavanja prava na privatnost i drugih ljudskih i građanskih prava. Autor zaključuje da samo transparentna nadnacionalna obaveštajna služba smeštena u normativni i institucionalni okvir EU može da doprinese delotvornijoj zaštiti vitalnih bezbednosnih interesa, a bez podrivanja zaštite ljudskih prava kao jedne od temeljnih vrednosti evropske integracije.

Reference

1. “Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission to written questions E-006018/12 and E-006020/12”, 16 August 2012, European Parliament, www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2012006020&language=CS.
2. Baldwin, David A., “The concept of security”, Review of Interna­tional Studies, 23, 1997.
3. Bigo, Didier et al., “Mass Surveillance of Personal Data by EU Member States and its Compatibility with EU Law”, CEPS Pa­pers in Liberty and Security in Europe, 61, November 2013, Centre for European Policy Studies, www.ceps.eu/system/files/No%2062%20Surveillance%20of%20Personal%20Data%20 by%20EU%20MSs.pdf.
4. Birsan, Constantin-Marian, “Intelligence Effectiveness in the Euro­pean Union in the New Security Environment”, Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey (CA), 2012, http://calhoun.nps.edu/public/bitstream/handle/10945/27795/12Dec_Birsan_Constantin-Marian. pdf?sequence=1.
5. Bruneau, Thomas C., and Boraz, Steven C., “Intelligence Reform: Balancing Democracy and Effectiveness”, in: Thomas C. Bruneau and Steven C. Boraz (eds), Reforming Intelligence: Ob­stacles to Democratic Control and Effectiveness, University of Texas Press, Austin, 2007.
6. Buuren, Jelle van, “Secret Truth: The EU Joint Situation Centre”, Eurowatch, 2009, www.statewatch.org/news/2009/aug/SitCen2009.pdf.
7. Charrett, Catherine, A Critical Application of Securitization The­ory: Overcoming the Normative Dilemma of Writing Security, International Catalan Institute for Peace, Barcelona, 2009.
8. “Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 of 26 October 2004 estab­lishing a European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union”, Official Journal of the European Union, L 349, 25 November 2004, http://frontex.europa.eu/assets/About_Frontex/ frontex_regulation_en.pdf.
9. Eckes, Christina, “Decision-making in the Dark?: Autonomous EU Sanctions and National Classification”, in: Iain Cameron (ed.), EU Sanctions: Law and Policy Issues Concerning Restrictive Measures, Intersentia, Cambridge, Antwerp and Portland, 2013.
10. Eriksson, Mikael, In Search of a Due Process: Listing and Delisting Practices of the European Union, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 2009.
11. “European Union Military Staff: An integral element of the EU comprehensive approach”, European External Action Service, 2014, http://eeas.europa.eu/csdp/structures-instruments-agencies/eu-military-staff/documents/new_spring_summer_eums_ brochure_march_2014.pdf.
12. “European Union Satellite Centre: Mission, Facts and Figures”, www.satcen.europa.eu/images/stories/ satcen%20leaflet_en.pdf.
13. “Europol: coordinating the fight against serious and organised crime”, European Union Committee, House of Lords, November 2008, www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ deucom/183/183.pdf.
14. Фатић, Александар, Кораћ, Срђан и Булатовић, Александра, Етика криминалистичко-обавештајног рада, Институт за међународну политику и привреду, Београд, 2013.
15. “Fight against terrorism”, Council of the European Union, 12685/04, 22 September 2004, www.statewatch.org/news/2004/sep/12685. pdf.
16. “Fight against the financing of terrorism — implementation of Com­mon Position 2001/931/CFSP”, Council of the European Union, 28 June 2007, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/ st10826-re0en07.pdf.
17. Gill, Peter, “The Politicization of Intelligence: Lessons from the In­vasion of Iraq”, in: Hans Born, Loch K. Johnson, and Ian Leigh, Who’s Watching the Spies?: Establishing Intelligence Service Ac­countability, Potomac Books, Dulles, 2005.
18. Goede, Marieke De, “The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe”, European Journal of International Relations , Vol. 14, No. 1, 2008.
19. Güssgen, Florian, “Of Swiss Army Knives and Diplomacy: A Review of the Union’s Diplomatic Capabilities”, Jean Monnet Working Papers in Comparative and International Politics, No. 33, April 2001, http://aei.pitt.edu/39611/jmwp33.htm.
20. Herman, Michael, “Ethics and Intelligence After September 2001”, in: Len Scott and Peter D. Jackson (eds), Understanding Intel­ligence in the Twenty-First Century: Journeys in Shadows, Rout­ledge, London and New York, 2004.
21. “Human Development Report 1994”, UNDP, 1994, http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/hdr_1994_en. pdf.
22. Jarvis, Robert, “Intelligence, Civil-Intelligence Relations, and De­mocracy”, in: Thomas C. Bruneau and Steven C. Boraz (eds), Reforming Intelligence: Obstacles to Democratic Control and Effectiveness, University of Texas Press, Austin, 2007.
23. “Joint answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission to written question E-006017/2012”, 25 July 2012, European Parliament, www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2012006017&language=EN.
24. Jones, Chris, “Secrecy reigns at the EU’s Intelligence Analysis Cen­tre”, Statewatch Journal, 22, No. 4, January 2013, www. statewatch.org/subscriber/protected/sw22n4.pdf.
25. Krause, Keith, and Williams, Michael C., “Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods”, Mershon Interna­tional Studies Review, 40, No. 2, October 1996.
26. LIBE Committee Inquiry on Electronic Mass Surveillance of EU Citizens, video recording, 24 September 2013, European Parliament, www.europarl.europa.eu/ep-live/en/committees/ video?event=20130924-0900-COMMITTEE-LIBE.
27. Müller-Wille, Björn, “For your eyes only?: Shaping an intelligence community within the EU”, Occasional Papers, 50, Janu­ary 2004, Institute for Strategic Studies, www.iss.europa.eu/ uploads/media/occ50.pdf.
28. “Regulation (EU) 1052/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 establishing the European Bor­der Surveillance System (Eurosur)”, Official Journal of the Eu­ropean Union, L 295, 6 November 2013, http://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Legal_basis/Eurosur_Regulation_2013. pdf.
29. Rosamund, Ben, Theories of European Integration, Palgrave, Bas­ingstoke, 2000.
30. “Ten years of Europol: 1999-2009”, Europol, 2009, https://www.europol.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ publications/anniversarypublication.pdf.
31. “The EU Internal Security Strategy in Action: Five steps towards a more secure Europe”, COM(2010) 673 final, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Coun­cil, 22 November 2010, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0673:FIN:EN: PDF#page=2.
32. Wolfers, Arnold, “‘National Security’ as an Ambiguous Symbol”, Political Science Quarterly, 67, December 1952.