Main topic




Friedrich Nietzsche and Max Scheler perceive the spirit of their time and its deep social and spiritual crisis of Western civilization, emphasizing that the loss of common values ​​and landmarks in social life led to ressentiment alienation, meaninglessness, pessimism, despair, decadence, decay, nihilism.

In the paper, by method of comparative analysis, it is presented Nietzsche’s and Scheler’s perspectives of perceiving the crisis of the spirit of modern civilization and their proposals to overcome it. Both authors see the foundation of the crisis in the loss of meaning, the rise of nihilism and the wrong values ​​that society promotes, as a consequence of resentment. Scheler emphasizes the importance and power of the “world of life”. Scheler opposes the decadence of modern civilization by rehabilitating and reaffirming the absolute and eternal order of values, and resentment represents the destruction of the eternal order of values ​​in human consciousness. Nietzsche’s overcoming of resentment seeks to be achieved through the “affirmation of life”, the will to power that the subject lacks. Power determines human behavior as the main feature of Nietzsche’s affirmative ethics, so contrary to nihilism, as the spirit of the times. For Nietzsche, the unstoppable decline in the modern period is the result of nihilism, which he explains as a lack of goal or intention. All values ​​lack the will to power because the values ​​of decay rule, nihilistic values. In order to overcome the crisis, political reforms must be accompanied by cultural reforms and changes that would be carried out by philosophers-legislators by giving new guidelines and establishing new values ​​as guiding principles of man.

By depriving the strong and the aristocratic of their right to domination and revenge, ressentiment has become an extremely effective weapon in the hands of the weakling. For Nietzsche, ressentiment is the father of Christianity. Grown out of a destructive source, it has become a major creative cultural force in the shape of Christianity and its offspring. Ressentiment is definitely a dominant factor in our culture. Born out of the Christian attack on violence, it became the father of modern Western society. Friedrich Nietzsche and Max Scheler defined ressentiment as a form of political anger that does not seek a clear remedy. It is this particular conception of irremediable political discontent that appears.

Nietzsche and Scheler originally conceived ressentiment as a critique of the striving towards egalitarianism. Scheler sought to discover how to save man from the crisis of civilization, opposing all the false teachings about salvation that do not solve the crisis, but deepen it. The solutions he proposes are the rise of heroism and spirit in the war and the reintegrated national community, as in the days before and at the beginning of the First World War; affirmation of individual spiritual personalities and their solidarity under the auspices of the Church, as in the period from the second half of the war to the beginning of the 1920s; or the creation of a liberal elite of education that will unite science with (rational) metaphysics, in the last period. Nietzsche strives for self-transcendence and the establishment of a hierarchy in society according to the greatness of humanity itself as a need for the policy of salvation in the age of nihilism, which will be led by the superman. Nietzsche longs for a new humanity that would be just an expression of the nihilistic conditions he wants to overcome. Undisguised is his dissatisfaction with the present man whom he identifies with the resentment towards life. Because of the crisis of authority, and in search of a dead God, humanity needs new idols or ideas, which will be the new metaphysical foundations of morality. It is essential, for a modern man to find himself, while at the same time showing that it is necessary to establish new legislation.

The paper concludes that the causes of the crisis of modern civilization are found in the “inverted values” of the lower class according to Scheler and slavish morality with values ​​that lack the will to power in Nietzsche.

keywords :


    • Barbalet, Jack. 2001. Emotion, Social Theory and Social Structure: A Macro-sociological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bershady, Harold J. 1992. “Introduction” In On Feeling, Knowing, and Valuing:
    • Selected Writings, Max Scheler. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
    • Bochenski, Józef Maria, 1960. “A note on the Author.” In On the Eternal in Man, Max Scheler. London:
    • S.C.M.Press.
    • Brobjer, Thomas. 1996. “On the Reevaluation of Values.” Nietzschean Studien 25, 342-48.
    • Connolly, William E. 1988. Political Theory and Modernity, New York: Basil Blackwell.
    • Connolly, William Е. 1991. Identity and Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political
    •  Paradox, Ithaca: Cornell University Press
    • Detwiler Bruce. 1990. Nietzsche and the Politics of Aristocratic Radicalism, Chicago: University               of Chicago Press.
    • Galović, Milan 1989. Bitak i ljubav. Maks Šeler od fenomenologije do filozofske antropologije,
    • Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo.
    • Golomb, Jacob. 2002. “How to De-Nazify Nietzsche’s Philosophical Anthropology?” In
    •  Nietzsche, Godfather of Fascism?, Jacob Golomb and Robert S. Wistrich eds., Princeton:
    •  Princeton University Press.
    • Girard, René. 1976. Deceit, Desire and the Novel: Self and Other in Literary Structure Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
    • Heidegger, Martin. 1994. Nietzscheova metafyzika Zagreb: Visovac.
    • Keen, Sam. 1983. The Passionate Life. New York: Harper and Row.
    • Kaufmann, Walter. 1974. Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. Princeton: Princeton
    •  University Press.
    • Korać, Veljko. 1962. “Problemi i stremljenja savremene građanske filozofije” U Glavne struje savremene filozofije, Volfgang Štegmiler. Beograd: Nolit.
    • Morelli, Elizabeth Murray. 1998. Ressentiment and rationality. Paper presented at the
    • 20th World Congress of Philosophy, Boston, MA.
    • Niče, Fridrih. 1985. Sumrak idola ili kako se filozofira čekićem. Beograd: Grafos.
    • Niče, Fridrih. 1986. Genealogija morala. Beograd: Grafos.
    • Niče, Fridrih. 1988. Ecce Homo. Beograd: Grafos.
    • Niče, Fridrih. 1992. Tako je govorio Zaratustra, Beograd: BIGZ.
    • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1988. Volja za moć, Zagreb: Mladost.
    • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1983. Rođenje tragedije, Zagreb: Grafički zavod Hrvatske, Biblioteka „Zora”.
    • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1999. Antikrist, prokleto kršćanstvo. Zagreb: Izvori.
    • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2002. S onu stranu dobra i zla. Zagreb: Dubravka Kozina Publisher.
    • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2003a. Radosna znanost. Zagreb: Demetra.
    • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2003b. Nachlass,1885–88, Writings from the Late Notebook, Rudiger Bittner ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Peri, Marvin. 2000. Intelektualna istorija Evrope. Beograd: Clio
    • Pippin, Robert. 2006. “Agent and Deed in Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals” In A Companion to Nietzsche, Keith Ansell Pearson ed., 371–387. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Ortega y Gasset, José.1928. Max Scheler. Un embriagado de esencias (1874-1928), Revista de Occidente, junio 1928
    • Scheler, Max. 1957. „Vorbilder und Führer.” Im Max Scheler Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 10: Schriften aus dem Nachlass. Bd. 1, Zur Ethik und Erkenntnislehre; Bern: Francke Verlag.
    • Scheler, Max. 1960a. „Probleme einer Soziologie des Wissens.” Im Max Scheler Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 8: Die Wissensformen und die Gesellschaft; Bern: Francke Verlag.
    • Scheler, Max. 1960b. „Erkenntnis und Arbeit. Eine Studie über Wert und Grenzen des pragmatischen Motivs in der Erkenntnis der Welt.” Im Max Scheler Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 8: Die Wissensformen und die Gesellschaft; Bern: Francke Verlag.
    • Scheler, Max. 1966. „ Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik. Neuer Versuch der Grundlegung eines Ethischen Personalismus.” Im Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 2: Bern: Francke Verlag.
    • Scheler, Max. 1968a. „Probleme der Religion. Zur religiösen Erneuerung.” Im Max Scheler Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 5: Vom Ewigen im Menschen; Bern: Francke Verlag.
    • Scheler, Max. 1968b. „Die christliche Liebesidee und die gegenwärtige Welt. Ein Vortrag. ” Im Max Scheler Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 5: Vom Ewigen im Menschen; Bern: Francke Verlag.
    • Scheler, Max. 1968c. „Vom kulturellen Wiederaufbau Europas. Ein Vortrag. ” Im Max Scheler Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 5: Vom Ewigen im Menschen; Bern: Francke Verlag.
    • Scheler, Max. 1972. „Vom Umsturz der Werte. Abhandlungen und Aufsätze.” Im Max Scheler Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 3: Bern: Francke Verlag.
    • Scheler, Max 1990. „Zur Idee des Ewigen Friedens und des Pazifismus.” In Max Scheler Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 13: Schriften aus dem Nachlass. Bd. 4, Philosophie und Geschichte. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag.
    • Simić, Željko. 2013. „Odjeci Ničeovog Zaratustre u epohi postmoderniteta”, Politeia, br. 5, Banja Luka, јun, 198-247.
    • Solomon, Robert. 2003. Living with Nietzsche: what the great „immoralist has to teach us. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Stanković Pejnović, Vesna. 2013a. „Nietzsche i liberalizam.” Filozofska istraživanja 33(1): 156-159.
    • Stanković Pejnović, Vesna. 2013b. „Politika kao moć kod Makijavelija i Ničea.” Srpska politička misao 40 (2): 11–29. doi: 10.22182/spm.4022013.1
    • Stanković Pejnović, Vesna. 2014. Lavirint moći Politička filozofija Fridriha Ničea. Novi Sad: Mediterann Publishing.
    • Stanković Pejnović, Vesna. 2020. „Otuđen čovek(radnik) posthumane kapitalističke epohe – perspektiva Ničea i Marksa.” Srpska politička misao 67(2): 79-102. doi:10.22182/spm.6712020.4
    •  Sutlić, Vanja. 1987. Praksa rada kao znanstvena povijest, Povijesno mišljenje kao kritika kripto filozofijskog ustrojstva Marxove misli, Zagreb: Globus.
    • Stikkers, Kenneth W. 1980. „Introducion” In Problems of a Sociology of Knowledge, ed. Scheler, Max.  London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • Šeler, Maks 1967. „Filozofski nazor na svijet.” U Suvremena filozofija Zapada, ur. Danilo Pejović, Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.
    • Šeler, Maks 1985. „Forme znanja i obrazovanje” Luča 2 (1/2): 187-212. Nikšić: Filosofski fakultet, Odsjek za filozofiju i sociologiju.
    • Šeler, Maks. 2011: „Resantiman u izgradnji morala.” U Eseji iz fenomenološke antropologije, Maks Šeler. Beograd: Fedon.
    • Šeler, Maks. 2013. Bit i oblici simpatije. Banja Luka: Vidici.
    • Štegmiler, Volfgang. 1962. „Primenjena fenomenologija – Maks Šeler” U Glavne struje savremene filozofije. Beograd: Nolit
    • Van Tuinen, Sjoerd. еd. 2018. The Polemics of Ressentiment Variations on Nietzsche. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    • Vattimo, Gianni. 2000. Dialogo con Nietzsche. Saggi 1961-2000, Garzanti, Milano.
Serbian Political Thought 3/2021 3/2021 УДК 17.022.1 157-190