Choose language:
Main topic

Serbian Political Thought

The Clash of Irreconcilable Worlds: A Critique of V.J. Vanberg’s Thesis on the Complementarity of Liberalism and Democracy

Abstract

This paper represents a critique of Viktor J. Vanberg’s thesis that liberalism and democracy are in some kind of natural symbiosis, owing to the same normative premise (individual sovereignty) and the same mode of relation (voluntary agreement) present among members of hypothetical social contract. This thesis is shown to be incorrect on two principal levels of investigation: level of abstract/normative analysis and level of history of relationship between liberalism and democracy. Vanberg’s treatment of the issue has several theoretical deficiencies: generally problematic positioning of liberalism and democracy, inappropriate mixing of normative level with methodological one, and narrow use of the notion “voluntary agreement“. Furthermore, historical experience of relationship of liberalism and democracy presented within this paper, documents that this relation should be explained in terms of struggle over dominance, rather than in terms of peaceful coexistence and natural symbiosis. The intentions of the critique of Vanberg’s attempt to “reconcile irreconcilable” is not just to present misguided arguments of this author, but also to show that, generally speaking, liberalism and democracy are two irreconcilable worlds and two more than different political philosophies.

keywords :

References

    1. Bobbio, N. (1987) The Future of Democracy: A Defence of the Rules of the Game. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    2. Bodrožić, Đ. (2005) “Liberalizam i konzervativizam i državne i društvene institucije”. Politička revija 4(1): 213-232.
    3. Boljević Ž. (2005) “Demokratija na kraju dvadesetog veka”. Politička revija 4(4): 1119-1126.
    4. Buchanan, James M. (2002) The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Foreword by Harmut Kliemt, 20 vols. 7 The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
    5. Cunningham, F. (2005) Theories of democracy: a critical introduction. London and New York: Routledge.
    6. Fukuyama, F. (1992) End of the History and the Last man. New York: The Free Press.
    7. Gottfried, P. (1991) “On Liberal and Democratic Nationhood”. The Journal of Libertarian Studies, 10(1): 1-10.
    8. Hayek, F.A. (1960) The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    9. Hayek, F.A. (1998) Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, Vols. 1-3. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    10. Hoppe, H. H. (2001) Democracy – The God That Failed: The Economics, Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order. Piscataway (NJ): Transaction Publishers.
    11. Kymlicka, W. (1995) Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    12. Lee, D. R. (1987) “The Calculus of Consent and the Constitutution of Capitalism“. Cato Journal, 7(2): 331-336.
    13. Locke, J. (2008) Two Treatises of Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    14. Mill, John S. (2007), On Liberty. New York (NY): Pearson Education.
    15. Novaković, A., Pešić, M. (2010) “Multikulturalizam i individualna prava – nekoliko zabeležaka povodom Kimlikinog tretiranja faza multikulturalizma“. Srpska politička misao, 27(1): 133-150.
    16. Novaković, A. (2008) “Filozofija slobode”. Srpska politička misao, 21(3): 129-150.
    17. Nozick, R. (2003) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.
    18. OECD (2008) The State of the Public Service. Paris: OECD.
    19. Pešić, M., Novaković, A. (2008) Sloboda i javnost – određenje, problematizacija, značaj. Beograd: Institut za političke studije.
    20. Prokopijević, M. (1998) “Javni izbor”. Ekonomska misao, 31(3): 191-212.
    21. Prokopijević, M. (2008) Kapitalizam i kriza, Katalaksija, [online]. Available at: http://www.katalaksija.com/sr/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=123&Itemid=1 [Accessed 18 October 2008].
    22. Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory Of Justice, Revised edition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    23. Sloterdijk, P. (2009) Die Revolution der gebenden Hand, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, [online]. Available at: http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/kapitalismus/die-zukunft-des-kapitalismus-8-die-revolution-der-gebenden-hand-1812362.html [Accessed 13 June 2009].
    24. Vanberg, V. (2008) “On the complementarity of liberalism and democracy – a reading of F.A. Hayek and J.M. Buchanan”. Journal of Institutional Economics, 4(2): 139-161.
    25. Von Mises, L. (1966) Human Action. Chicago: Yale Univeristy Press.
    26. Von Mises, L. (1951) Socialism – An Economic and Sociological Analisys. New Haven: Yale Univeristy Press.

     

PERIODICS Serbian Political Thought 2/2011eng 2/2011 UDC 329.12:321.7]:321.01 63-79
ç