Main topic


Supranational Governing Regime for the Global Economy


Since the onset of the current world economic crisis, whose effects continue to reverberate, the Group of Twenty has taken a premier role in world economic governance.  The group, which represents the major part of world economic flows, has been negotiating on a multistructural set of rules and recommendations in order to devise a new regime for the world economy. In light of this, the paper asks two critical questions: what are the values and norms of this new regime-in-the-making, particularly as they are manifest in new financial regulation, and how are these supranational norms to be put into (national) practices? The paper presents a brief history of regime-making in the period 2008 to 2014, and examines several soft-law models of supranational norm-creation in order to assess success in its implementation. The paper concludes that the G20 regime-in-the-making could prove successful in devising supranational economic policy for the present interconnected world economy if it takes the governance achievements of other such regimes into the account and if the members’ but also non-members’ national economic differences are taken into account to a greater extent. Otherwise, this new structure of norms might become another instrument for the sole benefit of industrialized countries.

keywords :


    1. Abbott, K., Snidal, D. (2000) “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance”, International Organization 54 (3): 421-456.
    2. Arend, C. A. (1999) “Legal Rules and International Society”. Oxford University Press.
    3. Beinhocker, E., Hanauer, N. (2014) “Redefining Capitalism”, McKinsey Quarterly, [Online]. No. 3. [Accessed 17 May 2015].
    4. Bernstein, S. (2009) “’The Investment Strategies of Sovereign Wealth Funds”. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper
    5. Biersteker, T. (2011) “Global Governance, the Sustainability of International Institutions, and the Potential Role of University-based Research Institutes”. The Eight Glion Colloqium on Global Sustainability, Glio, Switzerland.
    6. Bocknek, S., Gavrilova V., Montpetit K., Mladenova T., Grott T., Tsapralis, A. (2014) “2013 Petersburg G20 Summit Final Compliance Report”. Available at [Accessed 12 May 2015].
    7. Brummer, C. (2011) “How International Financial Law Works (and How It Doesn’t)”, Georgetown Law Journal , No. 99.
    8. Bunčić, S., Filipović, M. (2011) “The future of  international financial business: global regulatory framework”, African Journal of Business Management  5(9): 3749-3756.
    9. Bunčić, S. (2010) “G20 – Od Pitsburga do Toronta – put ka novoj finansijskoj regulative”. Srpska politička  misao, 29(3): 271-288.
    10. Cerny, P. (2007) “Multi-Nodal Politics: Toward a Political Process Theory of Globalization”. International Political Economy Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    11. Cohen, E. S. (2010) “Assessing the Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on Transnational Regulatory Governance: The Case of Public-Private Hybrid Regulatory Networks”. The Third Biennial Conference of the ECPR Standing Group on Regulatory Governance. Dublin: University College
    12. D’Amato, A. (2008) “’International Soft Law, Hard Law and Coherence”. Northwestern Public Law Research Paper, 08-01.
    13. Dingwerth, K., Pattberg, P. (2006) “Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics”. Global Governance 12, 185–203.
    14. “Discussion Paper of the Mexican Presidency of the G20”. January 2012. Available at: [Accessed 16 April 2013].
    15. Falkner, G. (Ed) (2005) “Complying with Europe: EU harmonization and soft law in the member states. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    16. Fairhurst, G. T., Putnam, L. (2004) “Organizations as Discursive Constructions”. Communication Theory 14(1): 5-26.
    17. Farer, T., Sisk, T. D. (2010) “Enhancing International Coopeation: Between History and Necessity”. Global Governance 16 (2010): 1-12.
    18. Filipović, M. (2011) “’Exigency Politics or New World Order”. Panoeconomicus, 3: 373-391.
    19. Filipović, M. (2012) “The G20 and the World Economic Policy: Agenda Development”. Serbian Political Thought 5(4): 83-102.
    20. Gersen, J. E., Posner, E. A. (2008) “’Soft Law: Lessons from Congressional Practice”. Stanford Law Review 61/3: 573- 625.
    21. Goldsmith, J., Posner, E. (2005) The Limits of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University.
    22. Goldštajn, A. (1967) Privredno ugovorno pravo. Zagreb: Sveučiliste u Zagrebu.
    23. Grevi, G. (2010) “The G20: Panacea or window-dressing?”. Policy Brief, ISSN 1989-2667, Madrid: FRIDE.
    24. Guzman, A. (2005) “The Design of International Agreements”. European Journal of International Law, 4/2005: 579-612.
    25. Guzman, A., Meyer, (2010) “’International Soft Law”. Journal of Legal Analysis 2/2010: 171-225.
    26. Guzman, A. (2007)How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. Oxford University Press.
    27. Humburg, M. (2008) “The open method of coordination and European integration”.  Berlin Working Paper on European Integration, 8, Berlin.
    28. Jordana, J., Levi-Faur, D. (eds.) (2004) The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Governance Age. Edward Elgar and the CRC Series on Regulation. Manchester: University of Manchester.
    29. Josifidis, K., Losonc, A. (2014) “Some Thoughts on Power: International Context”. Panoeconomicus, 5 – Special Issue: 597-615.
    30. Karns, M. P., Mingst, K. A. (2009) “International Organizations: The Politics and Processes of Global Governance”. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
    31. Kirton, J. J. (2010) “A Summit of Substantial Success: The Performance of the Seoul G20”. Available at: [Accessed 23 August 2013].
    32. Kirton, J., Kulik, J., Rasmussen, L. (2012) „A Firm Foundation for Los Cabos: G20 Summit Performance”. Toronto: 2008-2011 G20 Research Group, University of Toronto.
    33. Kirton, J. J. (2014) “The G20 System Still Works: Better Than Ever”. Caribbean Journal of International Relations & Diplomacy. 2(3): 43-60.
    34. Krasner, S. D. (2007) “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables”. In: B. A. Simmons, R. H. Steinberg (eds.) International Law and International Relations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    35. Kratochwil, F. (2013) “Politics, law and the sacred”. Journal of International Relations and Development, 16:1-24.
    36. “Mapping G20 Decisions Implementation: How G20 is delivering on the decisions made”. Draft Report (2012) International Organizations Research Institute of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (IORI HSE) and the G20 Research Group of the University of Toronto. Available at [Accessed 13 August 2014].
    37. Meyer, H., Barber, S., Luenen, C. (2011) The open method of coordination: a governance mechanism for the G20?. Brussels: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
    38. Meyer, (2009) “Soft law as Delegation”. Fordham International Law Journal, 32(3): 888-942.
    39. Overdevest, C. Zeitlin, J. (2014) “Assembling an experimentalist regime: Transnational governance interactions in the forest sector”. Regulation & Governance, 8: 22–48.
    40. Ocampo, J. A., Griffith-Jones, S. (2010) “The G20 and global financial governance – Policy Brief”. Madrid: FRIDE.
    41. Palma, J. G. (2009) “The Revenge of the Market on the Rentiers: Why Neo-Liberal Reports on the End of History Turned Out to be Premature”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33: 829–866.
    42. Peters, A., Pagotto, I. (2006) “Soft Law as a New Mode of Governance: A Legal Perspective”. In: “NEWGOV New Modes of Governance Project” CIT1-CT-2004-506392.
    43. Rosenau, J. N. (1995) “Governance in the Twenty-first Century”. Global Governance 1(1): 13-43.
    44. Ruggie, J. G. (1993) “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations”. International Organization, 47(1): 139-174.
    45. Scholte, J. A. (2002) “Governing Global Finance – CSGR Working Paper, 88(02). Warwick: University of Warwick.
    46. Sender, L. (2004) “Soft law in European Community law”. Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing.
    47. Setser, B. (2008) “Sovereign Wealth and Sovereign Power”, Special Report No. 7. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
    48. Shaffer, G. C., Pollack, M. A. (2008) “How Hard and Soft Law Interact in International Regulatory Governance: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists”. Society of International Economic Law (SIEL) Inaugural Conference 2008 Paper. Available at [Accessed 20 February 2014].
    49. Sheppard, B. (2013) “Norm Supercompliance and the Status of Soft Law”. Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper 2319557.
    50. Smith, G. S. (2011) “G7 to G8 to G20: Evolution in Global Governance”. CIGI G20 Papers, No. 6. Waterloo, Canada: The Centre for International Governance Innovation.
    51. Snyder, F. (1995) “The Effectiveness of EC Law”. In: T. Daintint (ed.) “Implementing EC Law in the United Kingdom”. London: Wiley, Chancery.
    52. Sorensen, G. (2006) “What Kind of World Order? The International System in the New Millennium”. Cooperation and Conflict, 41: 343-363.
    53. Trubek, D., Cottrell, , Nance, M. (2005) “Soft Law Hard Law and European Integration: Toward a Theory of Hybridity”. University of Wisconsin Legal Studies Paper, No. 1002.
    54. Von Jhering, R. (1999)Law as a Means to an End. New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange
    55. Vuletić, D. (2011) “Pravni aspekti Lisabonske strategije i budući izazovi-razrada s motrišta pravne prirode mekog prava (soft law)”. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 3/2011. Zagreb: Pravni fakultet.
    56. Wade, R. H. (2007) “A New Global Financial Architecture”. New Left Review, 46: 113 – 129.
    57. Wade, R. H. (2009) “From Global Imbalances to Global Reorganisations”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4): 539-562.
    58. Weil, P. (1983) “Towards Relative Normativity in International Law”. The American Journal of International Law. 77(3): 413-442.
PERIODICS Serbian Political Thought 2/2015eng 2/2015 UDC 339.97+339.7”2008/2014” 33-60