Main topic

Contents

Public Figures as Role Models of Serbian Adolescents: Who Are Idols and Why?

Abstract

The work deals with public figures as role models of Serbian adolescents. We had three major goals: 1) to classify adolescents’ idols and compare data to previous studies; 2) to classify reasons for idols’ admiration and to relate them to specific role model types; 3) to test the relationship between idols’ preference and adolescents’ socio-demographic features. The sample was convenient and consisted of 1404 students from primary and secondary schools in 5 Serbian towns. The question regarding public role models and associated reasons was raised and pupils were asked to name a public figure they look up to and pro­vide explanation why. The results show that: 1) Public figures from show busi­ness are the most popular; one new category (entrepreneurs) as a subcategory (you-tubers and bloggers within show business category) has been added to the earlier classification of role models, and there are changes in role model types preference indicating a value shift in Serbian adolescents; 2) Professional suc­cess of public figures is the most valued characteristic and sensible connection between types of idols and associated reasons is established by GLM ANOVA and logistic regressions; 3) the connection between idols’ preference and ad­olescents’ socio-demographic features is partly confirmed showing that those features are important for understanding adolescents’ role model choices. The results have been discussed in the light of previous research and the future directions of this topic investigation.

keywords :

References

    1. Anderson, D. R., Huston, A. C., Schmitt, L., Linebarger, D. L. and Wright J. (2001) “Self-image: Role Model Preference and Body Image”. In: W F. Overton (ed.): Early Childhood Television Viewing and Adolescent Behavior (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Develop­ment), New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 108-118.
    2. Aronson, E., Wilson, D., Akert, R. M. (2009) Social Psychology. New York: Pearson.
    3. Bandura, A. (1969a) “Social-learning theory of identificatory processes”. In:
    4. Goslin (ed.): Handbook of socialization theory and research, Chi­cago: Rand McNally. pp. 213-262.
    5. Bandura, A. (1969b) Principles of Behavior Modification. New York: Holt, Re­inhart and Winston, INC.
    6. Bandura, A. (2004): Social cognitive theory for personal and social change by enabling media; in A. Singhal, M.J. Cody, E.M. Rogers & M. Sabi- do (eds.): Entertainment-education and social change: history, research and practice (pp. 75-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    7. Bandura, A. (2005) “The Evolution of Social Cognitive Theory” In: G. Smith and M. A. Hitt (eds.): Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 9-35.
    8. Bartko, W & Eccles, J. S. (2003) “Adolescent Participation in Structured and Unstructured Activities: A Person-Oriented Analysis”, in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32: pp. 233-241.
    9. Bieber, (2003) “The Serbian Opposition and Civil Society: Roots of the De­layed Transition in Serbia”, in: International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 17(1): pp. 73-90.
    10. Bosma, N., Hessels, , Schutjens, V., Van Praag, M. and Verheul, I. (2012) “Entrepreneurship and role models”, in: Journal of Economic Psychol­ogy 33(2): pp. 410-424.
    11. Campbell, D. E. & Wolbrecht, C. (2006) “See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents”, in: The Journal of Politics, 68(2): pp. 233-247.
    12. Engle, & Kasser, T. (2005) “Why do Adolescent Girls Idolize Male Celebri­ties?”, in: Journal of Adolescent Research, 20(2): pp. 263-283.
    13. Eriksson-Zetterquist, U. (2008). “Gendered role modeling – A paradoxical construction process”, in: Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24: pp. 259-270.
    14. Farthing, R. (2010). The politics of youthful antipolitics: representing the ‘is­sue’ of youth participation in politics. Journal of youth studies, 13(2): 181-195.
    15. Giuliano, T.A., Turner, K.L., Lunquist, J.C. & Knight, J. L. (2007) “Gender and the selection of public athletic role models”, in: Journal of Sport Behav­ior, 30(2): pp. 161-198.
    16. Ivaldi, A. & O’Neill, S. A. (2008) “Adolescents’ musical role models: Whom do they admireand why?”, in: Psychology of Music, 36(4): pp. 395-415.
    17. Ivaldi, A. & O’Neill, S. A. (2010) “Adolescents’ attainability and aspiration beliefs for famous musicianrole models”, in: Music Education Re- search,12(2): 179-197.
    18. Jakopin, & Knežević, M. (2009). „VPS Srbije u kontekstu tranzicije i ekon­omske krize“, in: Ekonomika preduzeća, 57(7-8): pp. 376-388.
    19. Lin, Y-C. & Lin, C-H. (2007). “Impetus for worship: An exploratory study of adolescents’ idol adoration behaviors”, in: Adolescence, 42: pp. 575­589.
    20. Lockwood, P. & Kunda, Z.(1997) “Superstars and Me: Predicting the Impact of Role Models on the Self”, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psy­chology, 73(1): pp. 91-103.
    21. Petrovich, B., Tiodorovich, B., Kocich, B., Cvetkovich, M. &Blagojevich, L. (2001) “Influence of Socio-Economic Crisis on Epidemiological Char­acteristic of Suicide in the Region of Nis (Southeastern Part of Serbia, Yugoslavia)”, in: European Journal of Epidemiology, 17(2): pp. 183-187.
    22. Popadić, (1990): „Ispitivanje uzora i idola”. In: N. Havelka (Ed.): Efekti osnovnog školovanja. Beograd: Institut za psihologiju. pp. 301-320.
    23. Popadić, D. (1995): „Uzori mladih: uzrasne i generacijske razlike“, in: Psiho­loška istraživanja, 7: pp. 127-138.
    24. Popadić, D. (2003): „Uzori mladih u posleratnom periodu” In: Grupa autora (eds.): Promene vrednosti i tranzicija u Srbiji: pogled u budućnost. Beo­grad: Friedrih Ebert Stiftung i Institut društvenih nauka. pp. 195-202.
    25. Rot, N. (1973): Osnovi socijalne psihologije. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva Srbije.
    26. Skoko, S. (2000): Uzori mladih: uzrasne i regionalne razlike (diplomski rad). Beograd: Filozofski fakultet.
    27. Stebbins, R. A. (1997) “Casual leisure: a conceptual statement”, in: Leisure Studies, 16: pp. 17-25.
    28. Stepanović, I., Pavlović-Babić, and Krnjaić, Z. (2009) „Ispitivanje uzo­ra i idola srednjoškolaca u Srbiji”, in: Zbornik instituta za pedagoška istraživanja, 41(2): pp. 401-417.
    29. Stepanović, I. (2011) „Mladi i zabava: Ima li mesta za zabrinutost”, in: Engra­mi, 33(4): pp. 33-46.
    30. Šuković, D. B. (2014). „Korupcija i eknomski razvoj”, in: Srpska politička mi­sao, 43: pp. 43-54.
    31. Tomanović, S. & Ignjatović, S. (2006) “The Transition of Young People in a Transitional Society: The Case of Serbia”, in: Journal of Youth Studies 9(3): pp. 269-285.
    32. Treinor, S., Delfabbro, P., Anderson, S. & Winefield, A. (2010) “Leisure activ­ities and adolescent psychological well-being”, in: Journal of Adoles­cence, 33: pp. 73-186.
    33. Veljanovski, S. (2014). „Iskušenja medijske tranzicije”, in: Srpska politička misao, 43: pp. 235-250.
    34. Yancey, A.K., Siegel, J. M. & McDaniel, K.L. (2002): „Role Models, Ethnic Identity and Health risk Behaviors in Urban Adolescents”, in: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 156: pp. 55-61.
    35. Yancey, A.K., Grant, , Kurosky, S., Kravitz-Wirtz, N. and Mistry, R. (2011) “Role Modeling, Risk, and Resilience in California Adolescents”, in: Journal of Adolescent Health, 48: pp. 36-43.
    36. Zick, D. (2010) “The Shifting Balance of Adolescent Time Use”, in: Youth & Society, 41: pp. 569-596.

     

Serbian Political Thought 1/2017eng 1/2017 UDC 37.017+316.752-053.6(497.11) 5-20