PRINCIPLE OF TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY: POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE SEARCH FOR THE FINAL STATUS OF KOSOVO AND METOHIJA

Stefan Surlić

Andrijana Lazarevic

Abstract

The paper analyzes the principle of territorial integrity in the context of the dispute over the final status of Kosovo and Metohija. Without taking a position on the legal disputes, the authors provide an overview of the theoretical debate on territorial integrity and define the political consequences for Serbia’s territorial integrity since Kosovo’s* unilateral declaration of independence in 2008. Despite the constant mention of integrity as inseparable from sovereignty, the paper highlights the political practice in which Serbia’s “territorial integrity” has been turned into an appeal to other states to respect the principle of inviolability of borders. Support for Kosovo’s independence by leading Western countries conditioned Serbia to engage in a dialogue with temporary and then permanent administrative institutions in Pristina. The paper concludes that territorial integrity has been reduced to a declarative dimension, as the political demand for the protection of the Serbian community’s rights in Kosovo and Metohija has obligated Belgrade to make many concessions, including recognizing the sovereign rights of Pristina’s institutions.

References

• Abi-Saab, Georges. 2006. “Conclusion.” In Secession: International Law Perspectives, Marcelo Kohen (ed.). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Castellino, Joshua. 2000. International law and Self-Determination – The Interplay of the Politics of Territorial Possession with Formulations of Post-Colonial ‘National’ Identity. The Hague: Martinus Nihjhoff.
• Charney, J. Ian. 2005. International law and the use of force: a new framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Chivvis, S. Christopher. 2018. “The case for recognizing Kosovo.” Foreign Affairs 97(5): 44–52.
• Dimitrijević, R. Ivan i Milan Lipovac. 2017. “Nacionalni interes Republike Srbije: Analiza ekspozea mandatara Vlade od 2007. do 2017. godine.” Srpska politička misao 57 (3): 71–97. doi.org/10.22182/spm.5732017.4.
• EEAS. 2023. “Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue: EU Proposal – Agreement on the path to normalisation between Kosovo and Serbia.” https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/belgrade-pristina-dialogue-eu-proposal-agreement-path-normalisation-between-kosovo-and-serbia_en.
• Hrnjaz, Miloš. 2011. “Rezolucija 1244 ‒ u čemu je problem.” Politički život 3: 81–91. https://www.fpn.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/Politicki-zivot-broj-3.pdf.
• Hrnjaz, Miloš. 2015. Srbija i upotreba pravosudnog rešavanja međunarodnih sporova od 1914. do 2015. godine: vek neuspeha.” U Politički identitet Srbije u globalnom i regionalnom kontekstu, ur. Vesna Knežević – Predić, 253–270. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka.
• International Court of Justice (ICJ), Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo (Advisory Opinion), General List No. 141, 22 July 2010, hereafter Kosovo AO. https://www.icj-cij.org/case/141.
• Kilibarda, Pavle. 2022. “Francusko-nemački predlog za priznanje Kosova – opasnost rešenja leži u netransparentnosti.” KoSSev, https://kossev.info/francusko-nemacki-predlog-za-priznanje-kosova-opasnost-resenja-lezi-u-netransparentnosti/.
• Milidrag, Predrag. 2018. Unutrašnji dijalog o Kosovu: Pregled i ocena rezultata. Beograd: Fondacija za otvoreno društvo.
• Musliu, Valon. 2020. “Territorial integrity and the Kosovo issue: Conceptual approaches, international law, and the politics of statehood.” International Studies 57 (1-2): 117–133.
• OSCE. 1975. “Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe Final Act.” https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/5/c/39501.pdf.
• Peščanik. 2010. „Odluka MSP o Kosovu”. Poslednji pristup https://pescanik.net/odluka-msp-o-kosovu/.
• Politika. 2022. „Vučić u UN: Ovako složena vremena zahtevaju puno mudrosti i zajedništva, neophodno da ostanemo verni Povelji UN.” Poslednji pristup 25. april 2023. https://www.rts.rs/vesti/politika/4959376/vucic-u-un-ovako-slozena-vremena-zahtevaju-puno-mudrosti-i-zajednistva-neophodno-da-ostanemo-verni-povelji-un.html.
• Politika. 2023. „Vučić: Nikada neću pristati na priznanje i ulazak Kosova u UN, o svemu ostalom možemo da pregovaramo.” Poslednji pristup 28. april 2023. https://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/540193/vucic-sastanak-brisel-kosovo.
• Prvi sporazum o principima koji regulišu normalizaciju odnosa, 2013, Kancelarija za Kosovo i Metohiju Vlade Republike Srbije.  https://www.kim.gov.rs/p03.php.
• Rezolucija Saveta bezbezbednosti UN 1244 (1999). https://unmik.unmissions.org/sites/default/files/old_dnn/Res1244ENG.pdf.
• Rezolucije Generalne skupštine Ujedinjenih nacija [A/RES/64/298].
• Shaw, N. Malcolm. 2017. International law (8th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Subotić, Momčilo. 2017. „Kosovo i Metohija: pitanje unutrašnjeg dijaloga.” Nacionalni interes 30 (3): 81–105. doi.org/10.22182/ni.3032017.4.
• UN General Assembly. 1960. Declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples [A/RES/1514(XV)].
• UN General Assembly. 1970. “Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.”, [A/RES/2625 (XXV)]. https://unispal.un.org/DPA/DPR/unispal.nsf/0/25A1C8E35B23161C852570C4006E50AB.
• United Nations. 1945. “Charter of the United Nations.” Article 2. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text.
• Urrutia, Iñigo. 2012. “Territorial Integrity and Self-Determination: The Approach of the International Court of Justice in the Advisory Opinion on Kosovo.” Revista d’Estudis Autonòmics i Federals, num 16., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2365511
• van den Driest, Simone F. “From Kosovo to Crimea and Beyond: On Territorial Integrity, Unilateral Secession and Legal Neutrality in International Law.” International journal on minority and group rights 22: 467–485.
• Vučić, Aleksandar. 2017. „Autorski tekst predsednika Aleksandra Vučića za ‘Blic’: Zašto nam je potreban unutrašnji dijalog o Kosovu.” Blic. https://www.blic.rs/vesti/politika/ekskluzivno-autorski-tekst-predsednika-aleksandra-vucica-za-blic-zasto-nam-je/v7xgl6q).
•  Zajednička pozicija Evropske unije – Poglavlje 35: Ostala pitanja, 2015, Kancelarija za Kosovo i Metohiju Vlade Republike Srbije. https://www.kim.gov.rs/doc/pozicija-eu/Zajednicka%20pozicija%20EU%20PG%2035%20SR%20za%20sajt.pdf.