Main topic

ESSAYS AND STUDIES

CROATIAN ELECTIONS 2020: THE END OF TWO-PARTY COMPETITION?

Abstract

Since the year 2000, two large political blocs have been dominating the Croatian party system: the conservative one, rallying around the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), and the left-liberal, gathered around the Social Democratic Party. The dynamics of competition between these two groups indicates the basic political cleavage that lies on a single-dimensional Left-Right divide. The third options sometimes managed to break bipartisanship, at least in the short term, and to achieve relatively good election results. However, in the medium term, these breakthroughs have been largely unsuccessful, with third parties quickly blending into dominant bipartisan divide, resulting in a stable two-party competition. Until recently, the poor results of the populist right also contributed significantly to the stability of competition, since the dominant HDZ successfully covered that part of the ideological spectrum, largely because of its own nationalist heritage. HDZ thus held the positions of center-right party and populist-nationalist movement in parallel, effectively preventing the development of any viable anti-establishment option. The results of 2019/2020 presidential election signaled a change: for the first time, a far right-challenger (in this case, an independent candidate Miroslav Škoro) managed to win over twenty percent of the vote, effectively dividing the right-wing voters and causing disruption in relatively stable dual competition. Škoro based his result on the long-term pursuit of a part of Croatian voters for the third option, as well as on a number of smaller nationalist and populist parties and movements that emerged in Croatian politics in recent years. The reaction of his voters, who did not seem to blend in the bipartisan division in the second round of election, signals a change in the dynamics of an entire party system – possibly already in the next parliamentary election, to be held in July 2020.

keywords :

References

    • Beck, Ulrich. 2004. Moć protiv moći u doba globalizacije – nova svjetskopolitička ekonomija. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
    • Brubaker, Rogers. 2017. “Why populism?” Theory and Society, 46 (5): 357‒385.
    • Bursać, Dejan. 2018. “Expert survey on party ideology in former socialist countries, 1990‒2017.” Institut za političke studije. Poslednji pristup 20. 01. 2020. http://www.ips.ac.rs/researchers/dejan-bursac
    • Čakar, Dario Nikić. 2019. “The Presidentialisation of Political Parties in Croatia: Institutional Change Matters.” In The Presidentialisation of Political Parties in the Western Balkans, ed. G. Passarelli, 23-47. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Gallagher, Michael. 2019. “Election indices.” TCD. Poslednji pristup 20. 01. 2020.
      https://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/people/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/Docts/ElectionIndices.pdf
    • Hajek, Lukas. 2017. “Left, Right, Left, Right… Centre: Ideological Position of Andrej Babiš’s
      ANO.” Czech Journal of Political Science, 3/2017, 275‒301.
    • Hejvud, Endru. 2004. Politika. Beograd: Klio.
    • Henjak, Andrija. 2017a. „Lojalnost, glas ili izlazak: izborna participacija i potpora novim
      strankama u Hrvatskoj.” Anali Hrvatskog politološkog društva, 14 (1): 79‒103.
    • Henjak, Andrija. 2017b. „Nose li parlamentarni izbori 2015. i 2016. godine promjenu političkih
      rascjepa u Hrvatskoj?” Društvena istraživanja, 27 (3): 383‒406.
    • Henjak, Andrija, Nenad Zakošek and Goran Čular. 2013. “Croatia.” In The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, eds. S. Berglund, J. Ekman, K. Deegan-Krause and T. Knutsen, 443‒480. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
    • Hloušek, Vit, and Maximilian Strmiska. 1999. “The Predominant Party System in the Post-
      communist Croatia: Some Remarks.” Central European Political Studies Review, 1 (2): https://journals.muni.cz/cepsr/issue/view/300
    • Jou, Willy. 2010. “Continuities and changes in left–right orientations in new democracies: The
      cases of Croatia and Slovenia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43 (1): 97‒113.
    • Koyama, Yoji. 2003. “Transition in Croatia.” Ekonomski pregled, 54 (11‒12): 979‒998.
    • Lajphart, Arend. 2003. Modeli demokratije. Beograd: Službeni list, Podgorica: CID.
    • Miščević, Nenad. 2019. „Vratit ćemo narodu državu – desni populizam, nacionalizam i novi
      izazovi.” Političke perspektive, 9 (1): 37‒66.
    • Sartori, Đovani. 2002. Stranke i stranački sustavi. Zagreb: Politička kultura.
    • Siaroff, Alan. 2000. Comparative European Party Systems: An Analysis of Parliamentary
      Elections since 1945 (Contemporary Issues in European Politics)
      . New York: Garland Publishing.
    • Spasojević, Dušan. 2015. „Socio-strukturna paradigma u političkoj nauci.” Srpska politička misao, posebno izdanje, 2/2015: 7‒34.
    • Šedo, Jakub. 2010. “The party system of Croatia.” In Party Politics in the Western Balkans,  eds. V. Stojarova and P. Emerson, 73‒84. London: Routledge.
    • Špoljar, Marko. 2020. „Miroslav Škoro za Jutarnji: Moj plan za osvajanje Sabora.” Jutarnji list, 20. 01. 2020. https://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/miroslav-skoro-za-jutarnji-moj-
      plan-za-osvajanje-sabora-na-izbore-cemo-izaci-kao-pokret-pod-mojim-zastitnim
      znakom/9871585/
    • Zacharzewski, Anthony. 2011. “Populism: some definitions.” The Democratic Society.
      https://www.demsoc.org/2011/04/29/populism-some-definitions
    • Zakošek, Nenad. 1994. „Struktura i dinamika hrvatskoga stranačkog sustava.” Revija za
      sociologiju, 25 (1‒2): 23‒39.
PERIODICS Serbian Political Thought 2/2020 2/2020 УДК 324(497.5)“2020“ 183-204
ç