Main topic

CONTEMPLATING POLITICAL PHENOMENA: THEORY AND PRACTICE

ASSURANCE GAME IN LARGE GROUPS

Abstract

I look into assurance games in large groups (more than two players). After discussing a typical two-player example, I show the differences between the game in smaller and larger groups by focusing on the assurance that all the members of the collective will do the same. I discuss four examples: voting in committees, participation in street protest, electoral voting for smaller parties, and participation in a resistance movement. I claim that each of these instances of large group assurance games require different type of focal point to overcome collective action problem. Voting in committees requires a pivot, street protest require a specific type of participants, voting for smaller parties require political optimism among party members and voters, and joining resistance movement requires specific types of norms and communities that guarantee safety in number.

keywords :

References

    • Akerlof, Robert, i Robert Šiler. 2010. Životni duh. Kako psihologija čoveka pokreće ekonomiju i zbog čega je to značajno za svetski kapitalizam. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
    • Bovens, Luc. 2015. “The Tragedy of the Commons as a Voting Game”. In The Prisoner’s Dilemma, ed. Martin Petersen, 156‒176. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Dixit, Avinas, Susan Skeath, and David H. Railey. 2015. Games of Strategy, 4th edition. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.
    • Elster, Jon. 2007. Explaining Social Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Elster, Jon. 2014. Kako objasniti društveno ponašanje. Još matica i šrafova za društvene nauke. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
    • Elster, Јon. 1989. The Cement of Society. A Study of Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Fisher, Stephen L., 1973. “The Wasted Vote Thesis: West German Evidence”. Comparative Politics, Vol. 5, No. 2: 293‒299.
    • Frohlich, Norman, and Joe A. Oppenheimer. 1970. “I Get by with a Little Help from my Friends”. World Politics, No. 23: 104‒120.
    • Granovetter, Mark. 1978. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior”. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 489‒515.
    • Hardin, Russel, 1982. Collective Action. Washington DC: RFF Press.
    • Kuzmanović, Marija. 2017. Teorija igara. Beograd: Fakultet organizacionih nauka.
    • Marwall, Gerald, and Pamela Oliver. 1993. Critical Mass in Collective Action. A Micro-Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Mueller, Dennis C. 2003. Public Choice III, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pavlović, Dušan, 2019. “Igra uveravanja u velikim grupama. Ekonomski primeri”. Godišnjak FPN, god. XIII, 21: 153–172.
    • Pavlović, Dušan. 2015. Teorija igara. Osnovne igre i primena, drugo izdanje. Beograd: Čigoja štampa i FPN.
    • Petersen, Roger D. 2001. Resistance and Rebellion. Lessons from Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Popkin, Samuel L. 1979. The Rational Peasant. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    • Popkin, Samuel L., 1988. “Political Entrepreneurs and Peasant Movements in Vietnam”. In Rationality and Revolution. ed. Taylor Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Schelling, Thomas C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    • Todaro, Michael, and Stephen Smith. 2014. Economic Development, 12th edition. Boston: Pearson.
PERIODICS Serbian Political Thought 1/2020 1/2020 УДК 519.83:316.64 103-128
ç