AMERICAN STRUGGLE FOR GLOBAL LEADERSHIP AND THE STRATEGIC OPTIONS OF SERBIA

Mladen Lišanin

Abstract

Contemporary turbulence regarding the issue of global leadership (referred to by some authors as “primacy” or “hegemony”) takes place within a specific context, manifested through a single fundamental rift: the one based on key actors’ attitudes towards the necessity of structural revision of the world system, contrasted with aspirations to maintain the status quo. In other words, the struggle for global leadership not only has different goals, but also a different logic altogether, if it is observed from the aspect of a declining hegemon, or from the aspects of its challengers. At the same time, the fact that the hegemon is usually a status quo power, seeking to maintain the basic global parameters of power distribution, does not mean that it will not behave in a revisionist manner in various subsystem (regional and sub-regional) frameworks. One of the sub-regions in which the inverse logic of the actions of the global hegemon and those of its challengers on the status quo – revisionism spectrum is apparent, is the Western Balkans. Such behavior, as well as the conditions of increased complexity of foreign policy determinants from the system and regional levels, have consistently incentivized Serbia to opt for the strategy of hedging, in order to compensate the costs incurred in some areas by gains in others. The field of defence and security in the form of joint exercises and arms procurement, has been of particular importance in this regard, as Serbia has been pursuing close and dynamic relations with a wide range of partners, including the US, Russia, China, Israel, France and other European countries, NATO members and non-members alike. In terms of Serbian-American relations, NATO remains a crucial catalyst; however, the US is increasingly engaged in a more straightforward, bilateral manner – e.g. with regard to the Kosovo and Metohija issue, which is yet another motive for Serbia to maintain its hedging strategy. The trends of global primacy competition, dramatically accelerated at the beginning of the third decade of the 21^st century, particularly as the war in Ukraine keeps unfolding, will remain a determinant which strategic options of Serbia largely depend upon. Hedging is most likely to remain the key feature of Serbia’s strategic posture, although there is a possibility this might change in light of a potentially renewed transatlantic and intra-European political coherence.

References

• Branković, Živojin. 2020. „Srbiji isporučen prvi deo artiljerijsko-raketnih sistema PVO Pancir-S1.” Tango Six. 23. februar 2020. https://tangosix.rs/2020/23/02/srbiji-isporucen-prvi-deo-artiljerijsko-raketnih-sistema-pvo-pancir-s1.
• Branković, Živojin. 2021. „Srbija sledeće godine dobija nove Talesove radare za vazdušno osmatranje, javljanje i navođenje.” Tango Six. 23. decembar 2021. https://tangosix.rs/2021/23/12/srbija-sledece-godine-dobija-nove-talesove-radare-za-vazdusno-osmatranje-javljanje-i-navodjenje.
• Chan, Steve. 2021. “Challenging the Liberal Order: the US Hegemon as a Revisionist Power.” International Affairs 97 (5): 1335–1352. doi: 10.1093/ia/iiab074.
• Ciorciari, John D. 2019. “The Variable Effectiveness of Hedging Strategies.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 19 (3): 523–555. doi: 10.1093/irap/lcz007.
• Dašić, Marko. 2021. „Odnosi Sjedinjenih Američkih Država i Republike Srbije u kontekstu rešavanja sporova na Zapadnom Balkanu: istorijske analogije i savremeni problemi.” U Srpsko-američki odnosi: trideset godina od pada Berlinskog zida, ur. Dragan R. Simić, Dragan Živojinović i Stevan Nedeljković, 187–214. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet političkih nauka.
• Đurđević, Mila. 2021. „Srbija kineske dronove platila 19,3 miliona dolara.” Radio Slobodna Evropa. 18. maj 2021. https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/srbija-kina-cena-dronova/31260908.html.
• European Council. 2003. 2518^th Meeting: External Relations. 10369/03 (Presse 166). 16 June 2003. Luxembourg.
• Gaddis, John Lewis. 2018. On Grand Strategy. London: Allen Lane.
• Glas Amerike. 2021. „Platinasti vuk: vojnici Srbije, SAD i još osam država na međunarodnoj vežbi.” 11. jun 2021. https://www.glasamerike.net/a/platinasti-vuk-srbija-sjedinjene-drzave-vezba/5925199.html.
• Historical Office – Office of the Secretary of Defence. 2022. “National Security Strategy.” Last accessed May 5, 2022. https://history.defense.gov/Historical-Sources/National-Security-Strategy/.
• Igrutinović, Milan. 2019. „Regionalni pristup Trampove administracije Evropi: sanitarni kordon prema istoku i jugoistoku? ” U Kontroverze spoljne politike SAD i međunarodnih odnosa u Trampovoj eri, ur. 89–107. Vladimir Trapara i Aleksandar Jazić. Beograd: Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu.
• Kenet N. Volc. 2008. Teorija međunarodne politike. Beograd: Aleksandrija Pres – Centar za civilno-vojne odnose.
• Kisindžer, Henri. 2011. Da li je Americi potrebna spoljna politika: u susret diplomatiji XXI veka. Beograd: Klub Plus.
• Korolev, Alexander. 2019. “Shrinking Room for Hedging: System-unit Dynamics and Behavior of Smaller Powers.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 19 (3): 419–452. doi: 10.1093/irap/lcz011.
• Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. 2021. “Getting Hedging Right: a Small State Perspective.” China International Strategy Review 3 (2): 300–315. doi: 10.1007/s42533-021-00089-5.
• Lišanin, Mladen. 2012. „Spoljnopolitički prioriteti Srbije.” Politička revija 31(1): 201–212. doi: 10.22182/pr.3112012.10.
• Lišanin, Mladen. 2021. „Dugo putovanje kući: savremeni međunarodni sistem i američko-srpski raprošman.” U Srpsko-američki odnosi: trideset godina od pada Berlinskog zida, ur: Dragan R. Simić, Dragan Živojinović i Stevan Nedeljković, 167–186. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet političkih nauka.
• Mandelbaum, Majkl. 2006. Treba li svetu Golijat? Kako Amerika deluje kao svetska vlada u 21. veku. Beograd: Filip Višnjić.
• Miršajmer, Džon. 2017. Tragedija politike velikih sila (izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje). Beograd: Udruženje za studije SAD u Srbiji – Čigoja štampa.
• Mitić, Aleksandar. 2022. „Stav NR Kine o Kosovu i Metohiji u kontekstu odbrane međunarodnog prava i širenja interesnih granica.” Vojno delo 74 (3): 17–31. doi: 10.5937/vojdelo2203017M.
• Porter, Patrick. 2020. The False Promise of Liberal Order: Nostalgia, Delusion, and the Rise of Trump. Cambridge – Medford: Polity Press.
• Radio-televizija Vojvodine. 2020. „Prve vojne vežbe Vojske Srbije sa Belorusijom i Kinom”. 23. januar 2020. https://rtv.rs/sr_lat/drustvo/prve-vojne-vezbe-vojske-srbije-s-belorusijom-i-kinom_1086803.html.
• Schweller, Randall L. 1994. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bring the Revisionist State Back In.” International Security 19 (1): 72–107. doi: 10.2307/2539149.
• Schweller, Randall L. 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Spektor, Matias. 2023. “In Defense of the Fence Sitters: What the West Gets Wrong about Hedging.” Foreign Affairs 102 (3): 8–16.
• Šekarić, Nevena. 2019. „Neke karakteristike geopolitičkog okruženja Republike Srbije – bezbednosno-odbrambeni aspekti.” Vojno delo 71(1): 7–21. doi: 10.5937/vojdelo1901007S.
• Tanjug. 2023. „Ministarstvo odbrane: Zaključkom Vlade taktička vežba Platinasti vuk 23 izuzeta iz moratorijuma”. 10. april 2023. https://www.tanjug.rs/srbija/politika/24256/ministarstvo-odbrane-zakljuckom-vlade-takticka-vezba-platinasti-vuk-23-izuzeta-iz-moratorijuma/vest.
• The White House. 2022. National Security Strategy. Washington, D.C.
• Trailović, Dragan. 2020. „Vojna i bezbednosna saradnja Kine i Srbije: pokazatelj nove uloge Kine u Evropi.” Politika nacionalne bezbednosti 18 (1): 125–145. doi: 10.22182/pnb.1812020.6.
• Unger, David C. 2012. The Emergency State: America’s Pursuit of Absolute Security at All Costs. New York [NY]: The Penguin Press.
• Vasovic, Aleksandar. 2022. “Serbia considers purchase of Rafale jets from France, president says.” Reuters. April 11^th 022. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/serbia-considers-purchase-rafale-jets-france-president-says-2022-04-11.
• Vlada Republike Srbije. 2022. „Vlada usvojila Zaključak Saveta za nacionalnu bezbednost RS.” 27. februar 2022. https://www.srbija.gov.rs/vest/613771/vlada-usvojila-zakljucak-saveta-za-nacionalnu-bezbednost-rs.php.
• Vojinović, Petar. 2021. „Srbija nabavlja još Erbasovih H145M helikoptera, svi se dižu na HForce 3 nivo, potvrđena nabavka transportnih aviona, ulazi se u viši nivo industrijske saradnje.” Tango Six. 15. oktobar 2021.  https://tangosix.rs/2021/15/10/partner-2021-ekskluzivno-srbija-nabavlja-jos-erbasovih-h145m-helikoptera-svi-se-dizu-na-hforce-3-nivo-potvrdjena-nabavka-transportnih-aviona-ulazi-se-u-visi-nivo-industrijske-saradnje.
• Vojska Srbije, „Aktivna faza vežbe Slovensko bratstvo.”18. jun 2021. Poslednji pristup 15. oktobar 2022. https://www.vs.rs/sr_lat/vesti/A182E6DBD00011EB8D050050568F5424/aktivna-faza-vezbe-slovensko-bratstvo-2021.
• Vojska Srbije. 2018. „Počeo Regex 18.” 15. oktobar 2018. https://www.vs.rs/sr_lat/vesti/9E8BA5E0D06611E8A50F0050568F5424/poceo-regex-18.
• Vojska Srbije. 2022. „Program državnog partnerstva Srbije i Ohaja.” Poslednji pristup 15. oktobar 2022. https://www.vs.rs/sr_lat/medjunarodna-saradnja/saradnja-sa-ohajom/program-drzavnog-partnerstva.
• Vojska Srbije. 2022a. „Naoružanje Vojske Srbije.” Poslednji pristup 27. septembar 2022. https://www.vs.rs/sr_cyr/o-vojsci/naoruzanje.
• Volc, Kenet N. 2008. Teorija međunarodne politike. Beograd: Aleksandrija Pres – Centar za civilno-vojne odnose.
• Walt, Stephen M. 1987. Origins of Alliances. Ithaca [NY]: Cornell University Press, Ithaca [NY].
• Zorić, Ognjen. 2017. „Vojno balansiranje Srbije: i Rusija i NATO.” Radio Slobodna Evropa. 18. jun 2017. https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/srbija-vojne-vezbe-i-sa-rusijom-i-sa-sad/28542142.html.