Tema broja

PRAVO I POLITIKA

SANKCIONISANЈE DRŽAVA ČLANICA EU ZBOG NEIZVRŠENЈA PRESUDA SUDA PRAVDE I NEOBAVEŠTAVANЈA O SPROVOĐENЈU DIREKTIVA

Sažetak

Predmet istraživanja u radu su sankcije koje Sud pravde na osnovu čl. 260 UFEU može izreći državama članicama u slučaju neizvršenja presuda ili neobaveštavanja Komisije o merama za implementaciju direktiva donetih u zakonodavnom postupku. Autori prvo analiziraju postupke predviđene stavovima 2 i 3 navedenog člana i ukazuju na dileme koje se javljaju prilikom njihove primene. Nakon toga, pažnju usmeravaju na same novčane sankcije koje Sud može nametnuti ukoliko utvrdi da je država zaista prekršila pravo EU. Tom prilikom objašnjavaju razliku između penala i paušalne sume, kao i kriterijume za utvrđivanje iznosa tih sankcija. Autori zaključuju da mehanizam sankcionisanja iz čl. 260 UFEU svakako doprinosi boljoj primeni prava EU, ali ima i neke nejasnoće koje Sud pravde u budućnosti mora otkloniti.

Ključne reči:

Reference

    1. Радивојевић Зоран, Кнежевић-Предић Весна, Институционални механизам Европске уније после Лисабонског уговора, Пунта, Ниш, 2016.
    2. Радивојевић Зоран, „Постлисабонске новине у систему судске заштите Европске уније“, у зборнику: Заштита људских и мањинских права у европском правном простору, (приредио: Предраг Димитријевић), Правни факултет, Ниш, 2016, стр. 19-40.
    3. Arnull Anthony, „The European Court of Justice after Lisbon“, in: The Treaty of Lisbon and the Future of European Law and Policy (eds. Martin Trybus, Luca Rubini), Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, 2012, стр. 34-54.
    4. Ćapeta Tamara, „Sudska zaštita u Europskoj uniji nakon Lisabonskog ugovora“, u zborniku: Reforma Europske unije – Lisabonski ugovor, (priredili: Siniša Rodin, Tamara Ćapeta, Iris Goldner Lang), Narodne novine, Zagreb, 2009, стр. 89-140.
    5. Garcia A. Ricardo, “Lisbon and the Court of Justice of the European Union”, Working Papers on European Law and Regional Integration, No. 1/2010.
    6. Gáspár-Szilágyi Szilárd, „What Constitutes „Failure to Notify“ National Measures?“, European Public Law, Institute of European Public Law, Hull, No. 2/2013, стр. 281-294.
    7. Jack Brian, „Article 260 (2) TFEU: An Effective Judicial procedure for the Enforcement of Judgements?“, European Law Journal, Wiley, Chichester, No. 3/2013, стр. 404-421.
    8. Jack Brian, „Enforcing Member States Compliance with EU Environmental Law: A Critical Evaluation of the Use of Financial Penalties“, Journal of Environmental Law, OUP, Oxford, No. 1/2011, стр. 73-95.
    9. Kilbey Ian, „The Interpretation of Article 260 TFEU (ex 228 EC)“, European Law Review, Sweet&Maxwell, London, No. 3/2010, стр. 370-386.
    10. Kornezov Alaxander, „Imposing the Right Amount of Sanctions under Article 260(2) TFEU: Fairness v. Predictability, or How To “Bridge the Gaps”“, Columbia Journal of European Law, Columbia Law School, New York, No. 3/2014, стр. 283-307.
    11. Lenaerts Koen, Maselis Ignace, Gutman Kathleen, EU Procedural Law, OUP, Oxford, 2014.
    12. Peers Steeve, „Sanctions for Infringement of EU Law after the Treaty of Lisbon“, European Public Law, Institute of European Public Law, Hull, No. 1/2012, стр. 33-64.
    13. Prete Luca, Smulders Ben, „The Coming of Age of Infringement Proceedings“, Common Market Law Review, Leiden University, Leiden, No. 1/2010, стр. 9-61.
    14. Radivojević Zoran, Raičević Nebojša, „Financial Sanctions against Member States for Infringement of EU Law“, in: Procedural Aspects of EU Law (eds. Dunja Duić, Tunjica Petrašević), Faculty of Law, Osijek, 2017, стр. 171-191.
    15. Raičević Nebojša, Đorđević Aleksovski Sanja, „The Control of Compliance with Judgments of the EU Court of Justice“, in: Legal, Social and Political Control in National, International and EU Law, (eds. Miroslav Lazić, Saša Knežević), Law Faculty, Niš, 2016, стр. 273-292.
    16. Sikora Alicja, „Financial Penalties for Non-execution of Judgments of the Court of Justice“, in: Research Handbook on EU Institutional Law (eds. Adam Lazowski, Steven Blockmans) Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham-Northampton, 2016, стр. 324-353.
    17. Theodossiou A. Maria, „An analysis of the recent response of the Community to non-compliance with Court of Justice Judgements: Article 228 E.C.“, European Law Review, Sweet&Maxwell, London, No. 1/2002, стр. 25-46.
    18. Wahl Nils, Prete Luca, „Between Certaintly, Severity and Proportionality: Some Reflections on the Nature and Functioning of Article 260 (3) TFEU“, European Law Reporter, Verlag Radical Brain S.A., Luxembourg, No. 6/2014, стр. 170-189.
    19. Wenneras Pal, „Making Effective Use of Article 260 TFEU“, forthcoming in: The Enforcement of EU law and Values (eds. Andreas Jakab and Dimitry Kochenov), Internet, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2821032, 03/04/2017.
    20. Wenneras Pal, „Sanctions against Member States under Article 260 TFEU: Alive, but not Kicking“, Common Market Law Review, Leiden University, Leiden, 1/2012, стр. 145-176.

    PROPISI I PRAKSA

    1. C-109/13, Commission v Finland, ECLI:EU:C:2013:880.
    2. C-121/07, Commission v France, ECLI:EU:C:2008:695.
    3. C-177/04, Commission v France, ECLI:EU:C:2006:173.
    4. C-184/11, Commission v Spain, ECLI:EU:C:2014:316.
    5. C-196/13, Commission v Italy, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2407.
    6. C-197/98, Commission v Greece, Opinion, ECLI:EU:C:1999:597.
    7. C-241/11, Commission v Czech Republic, ECLI:EU:C:2013:423.
    8. C-270/11, Commission v Sweden, ECLI:EU:C:2013:339.
    9. C-278/01, Commission v Spain, ECLI:EU:C:2003:635.
    10. C-304/02, Commission v France, ECLI:EU:C:2005:444.
    11. C-304/02, Commission v France, Opinion, ECLI:EU:C:2004:274.
    12. C-369/07, Commission v Greece, ECLI:EU:C:2009:428.
    13. C-374/11, Commission v Ireland, ECLI:EU:C:2012:827.
    14. C-387/97, Commission v Greece, ECLI:EU:C:2000:356.
    15. C-456/03, Commission v Italy, ECLI:EU:C:2005:388.
    16. C-457/07, Commission v Portugal, ECLI:EU:C:2009:531.
    17. C-496/09, Commission v Italy, ECLI:EU:C:2011:740.
    18. C-533/11, Commission v Belgium, ECLI:EU:C:2013:659.
    19. C-576/11, Commission v Luxembourg, ECLI:EU:C:2013:773.
    20. C-610/10, Commission v Spain, ECLI:EU:C:2012:781.
    21. C-683/15, Commission v Poland.
    22. C-70/06, Commission v Portugal, ECLI:EU:C:2008:3.
    23. C-95/12, Commission v Germany, ECLI:EU:C:2013:676.
    24. Commission Communication, Application of Article 228 of the EC Treaty, SEC(2005) 1658.
    25. Commission Communication, Implementation of Article 260(3) TFEU, SEC (2010), 1371 final.
    26. Memorandum on applying Article 171 of the EC treaty, OJ EC, 1996, C 242/6.
    27. Method of Calculating the Penalty Payments Provided For Pursuant to Article 171 of the EC Treaty, OJ EC, 1997, C 63/2.

     

PERIODIKA Srpska politička misao 2/2017 УДК 341.645.2:341.638(4-672EU) 243-261
ç