Đuro Bodrožić

Iskustvo

Resercher

Institute for Political Studies

1988-

Education

Faculty of Law, Belgrade University

PhD

2012

Faculty of Law, Belgrade University

MA

2007

Faculty of Law, Belgrade University

BS

1993

Đuro Bodrožić, PhD, is the Research Associate of the Institute for Political Studies and member of the editorial board of the journal Srpska politička misao (Serbian Political Thought). Author of the books: “Nacionalna država” (Nation State) (Srpska književna zadruga, 2015) and several academic papers and studies.

PERIODICS

IDENTITY AND HISTORY – CONTRIBUTION TO THE REMINISCENCE CULTURE

At the start of the work we point out to the appearance of the science historiography, we quote the thinkers who made a decisive contribution about historical theme and it’s processed by aplication of scientific methology. When it comes to the national identity, history theme is unavoidable. Without a feeling for historical reality, secret of nation is inaccessible. Because the nation isn’t some kind of abstract-sociological category which could be reduces to a series of purely sociological elements, such as: language, race, teritory, statehood, although those characteristics are to a lesser ot greater extent, the essentials for determining the national being. But, nation is primarily a consciousness of common destiny, which untes the members of the group. A nation becomes aware of itself only when it becomes aware of it’s history. By becoming familiar with it’s history, selfawareness, the people get their identity - become self-made. Undoubtedly, the power of remembrance is what makes people people. Memories are a form from which the image of identity, individuals and people are formed. The discussion about identity is a talk about collective memory and the mediums that enable it to be held. Ethno-history is a source of cultural power. Communities that can boast about it’s history have competitive advantage because of the feeling of moral superiority over those whose history is poor or suspicious. Others have nothing left but to engage in cultural wars, for the purpose of appropriating the inheritance. The Balkan territory is known for such wars, but it’s not the only place where we encounter such a phenomenon. The key factors of identity, and historical memory, relate to beliefs that do not exist without mythology. The destruction of mythical creatures represents the impact on the core of what makes a worldview of one nation, it’s image of the world. This inevitably leads to the erosion of ethnic ties and the destruction of the people. One nation lives with it’s legends as long as with it’s real history. The time of deep political and social shocks always brings rearrangement of the past, especially at the time when the national culture was subjected to the aggression of the globalist concept. Today the struggle for identity, to a large extent, is reduced to the battle for it’s history.

PERIODICS

ARMY AND STATE THE ISSUE OF CIVILIAN-MILITARY RELATIONS

The military function of the state is a basic state obligation. Military-related issues are the sole responsibility of the state. A monopoly on physical force is a specific feature of the state. The military is the most important instrument of state policy. In order to respond to its function, it must be strictly hierarchized and subordinated. Loyalty is the first virtue of a soldier. The military profession has its own history. Modern army and modern warfare are inseparably linked to the industrial revolution in England and the French civil revolution. The French Revolution was an event that changed the whole society the way warfare. The new type of army created in the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars have changed the nature of the war. The old tradition of dynastic wars with a limited number of participants and limited goals has become a past. We point to the importance of Prussia in the revolutionary military profession, especially the role of the Prusian General Staff. The success of German weapons was the reason for others to show interest in German principles and models of military organization. In the end, we pointed out the relation of military ethics to war and politics.

ç