Main topic




The raising of the issue of “independence” of the southern Serbian province for many years has been marked by various types of spin on the legitimacy of the secessionist demands of the Albanian ethnic group. The explanatory value of secession theories in the case of Kosovo and Metohija has not been fully validated, especially due to the fact that the Albanian national minority had a degree of autonomy before the conflict broke out. A systematic review of domestic and foreign research materials (theoretical and empirical findings) revealed a certain degree of deviation of the research results (consciously or not) from the real factual situation. Namely, a certain group of foreign authors, while analyzing the political and security situation in Kosmet, during and after the 1990s, constantly stigmatized the Serb side as the sole culprit for the outbreak of violent conflict, unlike the Albanian ethnic group (arbanas) as the only victimizing actor. On the other hand, a number of local authors in their works detail the dynamics of the development (cause, cause and effect) of violent conflicts caused by internal (terrorist group “KLA” 9 and external factor (NATO aggression). The precedent in international politics that has come about in recognition of the unilateral declaration of independence of Kosovo and Metohija is directly linked to the contestation of the national interest of the RS in maintaining its territorial integrity. The paper describes the political and security relations of two diametrically opposed positions of major powers on the legality of the unilateral declaration of independence of the southern Serbian province. The crisis of multilateralism that existed during the Cold War is taking on a new dimension following the armed aggression of the NATO Pact on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. In this context, the political economy of the attempted secession of Kosovo and Metohija after 1999 is conducted under the patronage of a provisional international civil-military administration. Permanently contesting the pursuit of any interest of the Serbian people in the area of its centuries-old existence is a feature of the inconsistent policy of a part of the international community guided solely by its hegemonic goals.

keywords :


    • Давидовић Сандра, „Модели приватизације друштвених предузећа на Косову и Метохији под окриљем унмик администрације“, Политичка ревија, бр. 50/2016, стр. 115-123.
    • Дугин Александар, Основи геополитике,  Екопрес, Зрењанин, 2004.
    • Степић Миломир, „Перспективе Косова и Метохије у контексту глобалних геополитичкихконцепција.. Интернет, 10/06/2019.
    • Army tehnology, Camp Bondsteel, Internet, 20/06/2019.
    • Baranovsky Vladimir, „Russia: a part of Europe or apart from Europe?.“ International Affairs 76, no. 3 (2000): 443-458.
    • Brubaker Rogers, Nationalism reframed: Nationhood and the national question in the new Europe. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
    • Coggins Bridget, Power politics and state formation in the twentieth century: The dynamics of recognition. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
    • Duško Dimitrijević, „Privremena uprava Ujedinjenih nacija na Kosovu i Metohiji i zaštita imovinskih prava.“ Teme-Časopis za Društvene Nauke 03 (2007): 473-510.
    • Dželetović Milenko, Economic (UN) Sustainability of the Kosovo and Metohija Economy, Kosovo: sui generis or precedent in international relations (Dusan Prorokovic) Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, 2018, pp. 321-343.
    • Fulton John, „NATO and the KLA: How the West Encouraged Terrorism.“ Global Security Studies 1, no. 3 (2010): 130-141.
    • Gibs Dejvid  „Humanitarno razaranje Jugoslavije“, Knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, Novi Sad, Sremski Karlovci, 2010.
    • Global research, Kosovo for “Europe”: Washington’s “Balkans Policy” and the Future of Serbia, Internet , 5/06/2019.
    • Gurr Ted Robert, Peoples versus states: Minorities at risk in the new century. US Institute of Peace Press, 2000.
    • Hale Henry, „The parade of sovereignties: Testing theories of secession in the Soviet setting.“ British Journal of Political Science 30, no. 1 (2000): 31-56.
    • Henkin Louis, „Kosovo and the law of “humanitarian intervention”“, American Journal of International Law 93, no. 4 (1999): 824-828.
    • Henry Hale, „The parade of sovereignties: Testing theories of secession in the Soviet setting.“ British Journal of Political Science 30, no. 1 (2000): 31-56.
    • Hobsbawm Eric, Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge university press, 2012.
    • Hudson Meadwell, „Breaking the Mould? Quebec Independence and Secession in the Developed West“, Notions of nationalism, Central European University Press, Budapest,  1995, str. 129-161.
    • Hughes James, „Russia and the Secession of Kosovo: Power, Norms and the Failure of Multilateralism“,  Europe-Asia Studies 65, no. 5 (2013): 992-1016.
    • Ker-Lindsay James, Kosovo: the path to contested statehood in the Balkans. IB Tauris, 2009.
    • Kohen  Marcelo, „Le Kosovo: un test pour la communauté internationale”, Conflits, sécurité et coopération ,(V. Chetail), Liber Amicorum Victor-Yves Ghebali, Brussels, Bruylant, 2007, 367-382.
    • Makarychev  Andrey and Morozov Viatcheslav, „Multilateralism, multipolarity, and beyond: A menu of Russia’s policy strategies“, Global Governance 17 (2011): 353.
    • Motyl Alexander, Thinking Theoretically About Soviet Nationalities: History and Comparison in the Study of the USSR, Columbia University Press, New York, 1992.
    • Paris Roland, „Kosovo and the metaphor war“, Political Science Quarterly 117, no. 3 (2002): 423-450.
    • Pavkovic Aleksandar and Radan Peter, Creating New States: Theory and Practice of Secession. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., Farnham, 2013.
    • Reuters, Kosovo invites bids for telecom company , Internet, 10/05/2019.
    • Reuters, Spain says won’t recognize Kosovo independence, Internet,  31/05/2019.
    • Roberts Adam, „Nato’s ‘humanitarian war’over kosovo“, Survival 41, no. 3 (1999): 102-123.
    • Roseberry Philippe, „Mass violence and the recognition of Kosovo: Suffering and recognition“, Europe-Asia Studies 65, no. 5 (2013): 857-873.
    • Smith Anthony, State-making and nation-building. Internet 26.05.2019.
    • Stepić Milomir, „The territorial division of Kosovo and Metohija: The question of geopolitical merit“, Kosovo and Metohija: past, present, future (2006): 16-18.
    • Telegraph, Kosovo’s prime minister ‘key player in mafia-like gang’ Internet, 28/04/2019.
    • The Guardian 24, Report identifies Hashim Thaci as ‘Big fish’in organized crime, Internet,’big_fish’_in_organised_crime___World_news___The_Guardian_151475.pdf 20/08/2019.
    • The New York Times, That Crush at Kosovo’s Business Door? The Return of U.S. Heroes  Internet, 10/05/2019.
    • The Parliamentary Assembly, Inhuman treatment of people and illicit trafficking in human organs in Kosovo  Internet, 25/08/2019.
    • Treisman Daniel, „Russia’s “ethnic revival”: the separatist activism of regional leaders in a postcommunist order“, World politics 49, no. 2 (1997): 212-249.
    • Troude Alexsis, „Le Kosovo au coeur de la question des Balkans, [Kosovo at the heart of the Balkans issue]“ , Geostrategiques, no. 08 /2013, pp. 129-140.
    • Troude Alexsis, „The geopolitical aspects of the 1999 NATO aggression against Yugoslavia“.  David vs. Goliath: NATO war against Yugoslavia and its implications (Nebojsa Vukovic)(pp123-130), Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, 2019, pp. 123-136.
    • Vincent Richard, „A narrative analysis of US press coverage of Slobodan Milosevic and the Serbs in Kosovo“, European journal of communication 15, no. 3 (2000): 321-344.
    • Wikileaks, The End of the Affair? The BND, CIA and Kosovo’s Deep State Internet, 3/08/2019.
    • Wood John, „Secession: A comparative analytical framework“, Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 14, no. 1 (1981): 107-134.
PERIODICS National Interest 1/2020 1/2020 УДК 323.173(497.115) 23-47