Main topic
LAW AND POLITICS
PROHIBITION OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENT OF CHILDREN IN SERBIA
Abstract
Considering the Second and Third Periodic Report of the Republic of Serbia on the exercise of the rights of the child as guaranteed by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child submitted to our country 41 recommendations for the promotion of children’s rights, including a recommendation on the explicit prohibition of the corporal punishment of children. The recommendation suggests the need to explicitly prohibit corporal punishment of children by law, to monitor and enforce this prohibition in all environments, and to promote positive, nonviolent and participatory methods of education through awareness raising.
The issue of the admissibility of corporal punishment of children has long been a topic on which there is no consensus in the domestic general and professional public, and the aforementioned recommendation also raises the question of the degree of compliance of local regulations on the rights of the child with international standards and practice in the field among experts who believe that corporal punishment of children is absolutely unacceptable. While some consider that the local legal framework for the prohibition of child abuse and neglect is quite satisfactory and that the Republic of Serbia, in compliance with the obligations undertaken by signing, ratifying or acceding to numerous international human rights and child rights treaties, has harmonized its domestic legislation in this matter with the required international standards, at the level of individual institutions and bodies responsible for monitoring the situation in the field of human rights and the rights of the child there is the view that in our country the corporal punishment of children is still not forbidden by law.
A critical analysis of applicable regulations in the Republic of Serbia regulating the rights of the child to dignity and physical integrity in all relevant areas (family relations, social protection, education, student standard, health, etc.) suggests that legal terminology, or more precisely the lack of precise legal definition key terms, such as: “physical punishment”, “physical abuse”, “violation of dignity”, “humiliating treatment”, etc., leads to different interpretations of the permissibility of corporal punishment, and therefore, an interpretation emerges, as the dominant one, according to which in the Republic of Serbia corporal punishment of children by parents for the purpose of education is allowed, if it is not humiliating and does not hurt the human dignity of the child.
As education through corporal punishment can seriously harm the establishment of a child’s value system because it represents a model of behavior offered to the child and suggesting that violence is an acceptable and appropriate strategy for resolving conflict in society, adopting such ethical views is very detrimental to the community. Therefore, prescribing an explicit ban on corporal punishment of children in domestic legislation governing the rights of the child is still a necessity. Not only that. In formulating future norms, attention should be paid to the issue of definitions and delineation of key terms, in order to avoid identifying corporal punishment with child abuse, which has so far been identified in practice as a problem.
References
- Committee on the Rights of the Child, CRC/C/SRB/CO/2-3, Concluding observations on the combined second and third periodic reports of Serbia, 3 February 2017.
- Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, also known as the European Convention on Human Rights [ECHR], 4 November 1950, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, supplemented by Protocols Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12, 13 and 16.
- Convention on the Rights of the Child [CRC], 20 November 1989, UNTS 1577, I-27531.
- Ćorović, Emir. 2012. „Sporni oblici disciplinskog kažnjavanja dece: da li je reč o osnovu isključenja protivpravnosti krivičnog dela ili nasilju nad decom?” Crimen 2: 211–221.
- Draškić, Marija. 2006. „Usklađenost domaćeg prava sa standardima Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u odnosu na član 8. Evropske konvencije.” U: Pravni kapaciteti Srbije za Evropske integracije, ur. Stevan Lilić, 64–111. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [ICCPR], 16 December 1966, UNTS 999, I-14668.
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [ICESCR], 16 December 1966, UNTS 993, I-14531.
- International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect [ISCPAN]. 2003. Intersectoral Approach to Child Maltreatment. Warsaw.
- Išpanović-Radojković, Veronika, Tanja Ignjatović, Ranka Vujović, Ivana Stevanović, Jelena Srna, i Nevenka Žegarac. 2006. Priručnik za primenu Opšteg protokola za zaštitu dece od zlostavljanja i zanemarivanja. Beograd: Centar za prava deteta.
- Kontrapress. 2014. „Otvoreno pismo javnosti – Upozorenje stručnjaka: Milivojević nije ni psiholog ni pedagog.” 11. decembar 2014. http://kontrapress.com/print.php?url=Upozorenje-strucnjaka-Milivojevic-nije-ni-psiholog-ni-pedagog.
- Krivični zakonik [KZ], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 85/05, 88/05, 107/05, 72/09, 111/09, 121/12, 104/13, 108/14, 94/16 i 35/19.
- Lukić, Radomir, Budimir Košutić, i Dragan Mitrović. 1999. Uvod u pravo, 13. prošireno i dopunjeno izdanje. Beograd: Službeni list SRJ.
- Mijović, Svetlana. 2018. „Telesno kažnjavanje dece sa aspekta porodičnog i krivičnog prava – (ne)pomirljivi tonovi.” Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 66 (3): 316–347. doi: 10.5937/AnaliPFB1803316M.
- Milivojević, Zoran. 2011. „Telesno kažnjavanje dece – da, ali razumno.” Nova srpska politička misao. 10. septembar 2011. http://www.nspm.rs/kulturna-politika/telesno-kaznjavanje-dece-da-ali-razumno.html?alphabet=l.
- Panov, Slobodan. 2015. Porodično pravo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
- Porodični zakon [PZ], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 18/05, 72/11 – dr. zakon i 6/15.
- Pravilnik o postupanju ustanove u slučaju sumnje ili utvrđenog diskriminatornog ponašanja i vređanja ugleda, časti ili dostojanstva ličnosti, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 65/18.
- Pravilnik o Protokolu postupanja u ustanovi u odgovoru na nasilje, zlostavljanje i zanemarivanje, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 46/19.
- Stevanović, Ivana. 2006. „Zaštita dece – žrtava zlostavljanja i zanemarivanja i Porodični zakon Republike Srbije.” U Novo porodično zakonodavstvo, ur. Zoran Ponjavić, 295–306. Kragujevac: Pravni fakultet u Kragujevcu; Centar za porodično pravo.
- Straus, Murray А., and Denise A. Donnelly. 2017. Beating the Devil Out of Them: Corporal Punishment in American Families and Its Effects on Children, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
- United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF]. 2002. Implementation Handbook for The Convention on the rights of the child. Geneva: UNICEF Regional Office for Europe.
- United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF]. 2007. Implementation Handbook for The Convention on the rights of the child. Geneva: UNICEF Regional Office for Europe.
- United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child [UNCRC], CRC/C/GC/8, General comment No. 8 (2006): The Right of the Child to Protection from Corporal Punishment and Other Cruel or Degrading Forms of Punishment, 2 March 2007.
- United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], A/RES/1386(XIV) (1959), Declaration of the Rights of the Child, Adopted unanimously by all 78 Member States of the United Nations General Assembly at its 14th Session, on 20 November 1959.
- United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights [OHCHR]. 2017. “CRC – Convention on the Rights of the Child. General Documentations and Consideration of State Reports: Antigua and Barbuda, Bhutan, Cameroon, Lebanon, Mongolia, Qatar, and Romania.” United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 75 Session (15 May 2017 – 02 Jun 2017). https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/SessionDetails1.aspx?SessionID=1100&Lang=en.
- Ustav Republike Srbije, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 98/06.
- Vlada Republike Srbije [Vlada], Zaključak 05, Broj: 5196/2005, Opšti protokol za zaštitu dece od zlostavljanja i zanemarivanja, Beograd, 25. avgust 2005.
- Vučković-Šahović, Nevena, i Nevena Petrušić. 2015. Prava deteta. Niš: Centar za publikacije Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu.
- Vujović, Ranka, i Ivana Stevanović. 2011. „Uloga pravnog sistema u zaštiti deteta od zlostavljanja i zanemarivanja.” U: Zaštita deteta od zlostavljanja i zanemarivanja – Primena Opšteg protokola, ur. Veronika Išpanović-Radojković, 142–161. Beograd: Centar za prava deteta.
- Vujović, Ranka. 2019. Lišenje roditeljskog prava. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
- World Health Organization [WHO], WHO/HSC/PVI/99.1., Report of the Consultation on Child Abuse Prevention, Geneva, 29–31 March 1999.
- Zakon o osnovama sistema obrazovanja i vaspitanja [ZOSOV], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 88/17 , 27/18 – dr. zakon , 27/18 – dr. zakon i 10/19.
- Zakon o parničnom postupku [ZPP], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 72/11 , 49/13 ‒ US, 74/13 ‒ US, 55/14 i 87/18.
- Zakon o socijalnoj zaštiti [ZSZ], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 24/11.
- Zakon o učeničkom i studentskom standardu [ZUSS], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 18/10 , 55/13, 27/18 i 10/19.
- Zaštitnik građana Republike Srbije [Zaštitnik građana], 161-7/17, Redovan godišnji izveštaj za 2016. godinu, Beograd, 15. mart 2017.
- Zaštitnik građana Republike Srbije [Zaštitnik građana], 161-3/18, Redovan godišnji izveštaj za 2017. godinu, Beograd. 15. mart 2018.
- Zaštitnik građana Republike Srbije [Zaštitnik građana], 3411-69/19, Redovan godišnji izveštaj za 2018. godinu, Beograd. 15. mart 2019.